- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 08:41:14 +0000
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
- CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 08:41:50 UTC
David wrote: > I suggest we drop back to 300%. Hi David, There was quite a lot of evidence, rational and justification in the issues review [1], could you provide some for that statement? The comments on the amount of resize/zoom (inside and out of the WG) seemed to fall into two camps: They were either happy with 400%, or thought anything over 150-200% was too difficult, so I’m not sure where 300% came from? Cheers, -Alastair 1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Resize_content_issues_review
Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 08:41:50 UTC