- From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:37:38 +0200 (CEST)
- To: josh@interaccess.ie
- Cc: laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com, akirkpat@adobe.com, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
"Update the original issue" can still mean A or B - which is it? Joshue O Connor schrieb am 10.04.2017 14:30: > IIRC we had agreed to update the original issue. > > Andrew - is this correct? > > Thanks > > Josh > >> >> Detlev Fischer <mailto:detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> >> >> 10 April 2017 at 13:25 >> >> >> My question here is whether what re-drafting option you /chairs and members of WCAG would prefer: >> >> A: adding revised draft SC text as new comment to the original issue, waiting for comments by others >> B: Making the change in the SC source (via the "edit this SC" link, which might invalidate some earlier comments) >> C: adding revised SC text as comment to the issue raised to which the change is a response >> D: Create an new issue for the revised text >> >> I currently assume A and/or C is the correct approach. >> >> Detlev >> >> >> -- >> Detlev Fischer >> testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese >> Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg >> >> Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45 >> Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5 >> >> http://www.testkreis.de <http://www.testkreis.de> >> Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites >> >> >> Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> >> >> 10 April 2017 at 12:57 >> >> >> Hi Laura, >>> >>> >>> Are SC Managers supposed to draft a proposed response for the public >>> comment pending official working group approval? >>> >>> >> Yes - that's the idea. Ideally, you can distill what you think an appropriate response is, based on group input into the SC etc >> and we will survey that to the group. >> >> Thanks >> >> Josh >> >>> >>> Or we just supposed to respond as individual SC managers on the public comment? >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Kindest Regards, >>> Laura >>> >>> >>> Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> >>> >>> 5 April 2017 at 08:44 >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Andrew and I have now assigned the current tranche of public comments to the SC Managers. >>> >>> We ask all SC managers to please review the comments for your issues, parse its contents etc - distill the substance and draft a response/any outputs etc. >>> >>> In some cases comments have been applied to people who are not SC managers but they are usually to people who >>> have already made a reply or demonstrated some interest in the issue/comment. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >> Laura Carlson <mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> >> >> 10 April 2017 at 12:41 >> >> >> Hi Josh and Andrew, >> >> Are SC Managers supposed to draft a proposed response for the public >> comment pending official working group approval? >> >> Or we just supposed to respond as individual SC managers on the public comment? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Kindest Regards, >> Laura >> >> >> Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> >> >> 5 April 2017 at 08:44 >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> Andrew and I have now assigned the current tranche of public comments to the SC Managers. >> >> We ask all SC managers to please review the comments for your issues, parse its contents etc - distill the substance and draft a response/any outputs etc. >> >> In some cases comments have been applied to people who are not SC managers but they are usually to people who >> have already made a reply or demonstrated some interest in the issue/comment. >> >> Thanks >> >> > -- > Joshue O Connor > Director | InterAccess.ie > >
Received on Monday, 10 April 2017 12:38:09 UTC