From: John Foliot [mailto:john.foliot@deque.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 9:24 AM Common Words > Provide words or phrases from a public core vocabulary Provide how? Where? I n any specific format? For what purpose? A "word list" minus definitions is simply a list of 1500 words... As Gregg notes, myself and others have questioned the mechanics of this in a practical sense, and we're simply not at a point technologically to make this useful. [Jason] In addition, as I’ve argued in my review comments submitted this morning, this aspect of the proposal raises internationalization concerns, and it would also unleash what might be called the “battle of the vocabulary lists” – irreconcilable claims and counter-claims about whether your list is better than my list with respect to this content in this context – and hence whether the content conforms to the proposal or not. I’ve also raised concerns about whether there are reliable criteria for identifying “non-literal language”, which, again, have to be available for all of the languages in which WCAG 2.1-conformant content would be written. ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2017 14:29:17 UTC