- From: Marc Johlic <marc.johlic@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 11:34:42 -0400
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABpp2mJZDTPD_Qh=6-80wCyVj0ZDUigUdJoPz5T4yZcr96zL6A@mail.gmail.com>
+1 to CfC - and I also like David's suggestion re: the Quickref On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 - **but**, this is a sloppy way to address us not getting the work > done to update 2.1 because we had identified, in my opinion, a too short, > unrealistic timeline for development of an important international > standard. That is why we are here now, doing this today. Please keep this > in mind for a **next** update. > > Katie Haritos-Shea > 703-371-5545 <(703)%20371-5545> > > On May 23, 2017 12:51 PM, "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Resending with the “high priority” flag per our process… >> >> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday May 25rd at 12:00pm Boston time. >> >> The Working Group has discussed the idea of providing additional guidance >> for accessibility beyond what is able to be included within WCAG 2.1. The >> idea is that success criteria proposals that cannot reach consensus or that >> there is insufficient time to review still have valuable information that >> might be able to be published for use. This idea was surveyed ( >> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/WCAG21_supp/results >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2FWCAG21_supp%2Fresults&data=02%7C01%7C%7C0e1bcac07c814137cfe008d4a1f37ca4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311514529786507&sdata=Z09nKmrz3%2BdDRAlSQIgS6EnTF3tnyKnkhx6IU63M3ds%3D&reserved=0>) >> and discussed on the call (https://www.w3.org/2017/05/23 >> -ag-minutes.html#item01 >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2017%2F05%2F23-ag-minutes.html%23item01&data=02%7C01%7C%7C0e1bcac07c814137cfe008d4a1f37ca4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311514529786507&sdata=fuNXCihUvTIK85l38EKARZUd1nbx6vv6mPMVhkv2TNg%3D&reserved=0>) >> and a resolution received consensus: >> >> RESOLUTION: the working group has agreed to publisihing supplemental >> guidance in 1 document that is non-normative >> >> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not >> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not >> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before >> the CfC deadline. >> >> Thanks, >> AWK >> >> Andrew Kirkpatrick >> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility >> Adobe >> >> akirkpat@adobe.com >> http://twitter.com/awkawk >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C0e1bcac07c814137cfe008d4a1f37ca4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311514529786507&sdata=O8WWKVhUNZMueiHT4tYMcpGAwn8CCG0MbtYsKZc6jO4%3D&reserved=0> >> Thanks, >> AWK >> >> Andrew Kirkpatrick >> Group Product Manager, Accessibility >> Adobe >> >> akirkpat@adobe.com >> http://twitter.com/awkawk >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C0e1bcac07c814137cfe008d4a1f37ca4%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311514529786507&sdata=O8WWKVhUNZMueiHT4tYMcpGAwn8CCG0MbtYsKZc6jO4%3D&reserved=0> >> >
Received on Thursday, 25 May 2017 15:35:17 UTC