Re: CFC - Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft

AGWG’ers,

As we have received substantially positive feedback leading up to this 
CfC, this CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group. 
There was one objection from James Nurthen, details of which are 
available in the related survey 
(https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/MATF_orientation/results).

This decision will be recorded at 
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FDecisions&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1ab6006ec2be48e88f9008d4a210961e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311639507586899&sdata=IafGoKjeQf7zBqxVj8m380hh8%2BWgU1VfPa2tZjq0Bx8%3D&reserved=0>

Thanks,
AWK


Marc Johlic wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com 
> <mailto:glenda.sims@deque.com>> wrote:
>
>     +1
>
>     glenda sims    |   team a11y lead   | deque.com <http://deque.com>
>        |512.963.3773 <tel:%28512%29%20963-3773>
>
>     /web for everyone. web on everything./ -  w3 goals
>
>     On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Joshue O Connor
>     <josh@interaccess.ie <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>> wrote:
>
>         Call For Consensus — ends Monday June 12th at 1:00pm Boston time.
>
>         The Working Group has reviewed and approved a new Success
>         Criterion for inclusion in the Editor’s Draft: "Orientation"
>         with the goal of obtaining additional input external to the
>         working group.
>
>         SC TEXT:
>
>         "Content is not locked to a specificdisplay orientation
>         <https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/orientation_ISSUE-70/guidelines/terms/21/display-orientation.html>,
>         and functionality of the content is operable in all display
>         orientations, except where display orientation isessential
>         <https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/orientation_ISSUE-70/guidelines/terms/21/essential.html>for
>         use of the content."
>
>         Survey results:
>         https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/MATF_orientation/
>         <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/MATF_orientation/>
>         Call minutes: http://www.w3.org/2017/06/08-ag-minutes.html
>         <http://www.w3.org/2017/06/08-ag-minutes.html>
>         GIT Hub: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/70
>         <https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/70>
>
>         The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full
>         draft:
>         https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/orientation_ISSUE-70/guidelines/#orientation
>         <https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/orientation_ISSUE-70/guidelines/#orientation>
>
>
>         If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position
>         that have not been discussed already and feel that those
>         concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this
>         decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.
>
>         Thanks,
>         -- 
>         Joshue O Connor
>         Director | InterAccess.ie
>
>
>

-- 
Joshue O Connor
Director | InterAccess.ie