Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation'

+1

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:27 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902>
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
> wrote:
>
>> To be clear for everyone, the language being accepted is at
>> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/accidental-activation_ISSUE
>> -65//guidelines/#accidental-activation
>>
>> Here’s the SC text:
>>
>> For single-pointer activation, at least one of the following is true:
>>
>>    - Activation is on the up event, either explicitly or implicitly as a
>>    platform's generic activation/click event;
>>    - A mechanism is available that allows the user to choose the
>>    up-event as an option;
>>    - Confirmation is provided, which can dismiss activation;
>>    - Activation is reversible;
>>    - Down-event activation event is essential and waiting for the
>>    up-event would invalidate the activity.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> AWK
>>
>> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
>> Adobe
>>
>> akirkpat@adobe.com
>> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>>
>> From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
>> Date: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 12:45
>> To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> Subject: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental
>> Activation'
>> Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 12:45
>>
>> Call For Consensus — ends Thurs April 13th at 1:00pm Boston time.
>>
>> On todays call the WG came to a resolution and accepted the proposed SC 'Accidental
>> Activation'. [1]
>>
>> Here are previous responses, and the most recent survey. [2] [3]
>>
>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
>> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
>> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
>> the CfC deadline.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/65
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fissues%2F65&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfc490a383fd4d9db1fa08d480fa3ced%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636275259685812309&sdata=KAOEoAsF1LeDrlUn5ctq8e2q0jiD48bySmpIBBECPvA%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> [2] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/March14SCReviews/results#xq6
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2FMarch14SCReviews%2Fresults%23xq6&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfc490a383fd4d9db1fa08d480fa3ced%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636275259685822300&sdata=gKL%2F6LESi%2FE8kRPOGYeI%2FbrbtO9RIdPOiriyt5L78Ww%3D&reserved=0>
>> [3] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/2017April5_top3/results
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2F2017April5_top3%2Fresults&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfc490a383fd4d9db1fa08d480fa3ced%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636275259685822300&sdata=Hah6RtZ3nRhbKuH6xaOQND%2F4%2Fa80yDE5442heOXLipA%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Joshue O Connor
>> Director | InterAccess.ie
>>
>
>