- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:58:45 +0000
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- CC: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Yes, we shouldn’t respond to the comments until we know the answer for sure. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk On 4/10/17, 09:54, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Andrew, > >Does this mean that SC managers shouldn't officially reply to the >public comments (saying yes your idea was incorporated or no your idea >has not been incorporated or some of your idea has been incorporated, >etc) until the CFC and the SC text has been accepted by the working >group? This would seem to alleviate much circular discussion. > >Thanks. > >Kindest Regards, >Laura > > >On 4/10/17, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: >> Yes, I agree. >> >> To sum up, we want to have a current version of the SC available from the >> links at the top of the issue, so the SC manager needs to update the text in >> the “SC for editing” linked page. >> >> Of course, this should be done with the good ideas from others commenting on >> the issue. >> >> What this does, to provide some high-level context for people, is it updates >> a branch in the repository that is separate from the editor’s draft. This >> serves as a review copy for the group and has no special standing related to >> ultimate acceptance from the group, except that it shows what is believed to >> be getting closer to a final form. >> >> Once the larger group reviews it and any final edits are put in place (and >> we have a CFC to accept it) then we will merge that branch into the editor’s >> draft, and the SC will appear in the monthly Working Drafts. >> >> Thanks, >> AWK >> >> Andrew Kirkpatrick >> Group Product Manager, Accessibility >> Adobe >> >> akirkpat@adobe.com >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C283361933e6e455bc8ac08d480191ced%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636274292728855015&sdata=c8q7ShJd8BVBtl4zwCmCtSeN7gn0PTYAgSMV2TIo5T4%3D&reserved=0 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 4/10/17, 08:43, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>Thanks, Josh! >>> >>>Kindest regards, >>>Laura >>> >>>On 4/10/17, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie> wrote: >>>> Hi Laura, >>>>> Are SC Managers supposed to draft a proposed response for the public >>>>> comment pending official working group approval? >>>> Yes - that's the idea. Ideally, you can distill what you think an >>>> appropriate response is, based on group input into the SC etc >>>> and we will survey that to the group. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Josh >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Or we just supposed to respond as individual SC managers on the public >>>>> comment? >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> Kindest Regards, >>>>> Laura >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> >>>>> 5 April 2017 at 08:44 >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Andrew and I have now assigned the current tranche of public comments >>>>> to the SC Managers. >>>>> >>>>> We ask all SC managers to please review the comments for your issues, >>>>> parse its contents etc - distill the substance and draft a >>>>> response/any outputs etc. >>>>> >>>>> In some cases comments have been applied to people who are not SC >>>>> managers but they are usually to people who >>>>> have already made a reply or demonstrated some interest in the >>>>> issue/comment. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Joshue O Connor >>>> Director | InterAccess.ie >>>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>Laura L. Carlson >> > > >-- >Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 10 April 2017 14:59:21 UTC