Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST.

agree with this.

it is sometimes confusing what the final text being called is — and it makes the Email record incomplete - esp where the link leads to text that can be later edited. 

thx


g 

Gregg C Vanderheiden
greggvan@umd.edu




> On May 4, 2017, at 11:27 AM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
> 
> I don’t want to make the task of the chairs and editors harder, but I’m wondering whether it would be possible to set a policy that, when a specific textual proposal is the subject-matter of a CfC, the text put forward for review should be included in the e-mail message announcing the CfC, so that it’s absolutely clear what is being decided.
>   <>
> I’m open to other ways of solving this problem, of course, with a view to minimizing the work involved.
>  
> From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 11:24 AM
> To: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>; Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST.
>  
> Looking at the minutes and the commits for the proposed SC for this issue, I’d say not. The minutes say “accepted with changes” but there have been no changes so we need to get those caught up first.
>  
> Thanks,
> AWK
>  
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe 
>  
> akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk <http://twitter.com/awkawk>
>  
> From: "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org <mailto:jjwhite@ets.org>>
> Date: Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 11:19
> To: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
> Subject: RE: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST.
> Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
> Resent-Date: Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 11:19
>  
> The version currently in the GitHub issue reads as follows.
>  
> “Content can be resized to 400% without loss of content or functionality, and without requiring two-dimensional scrolling except for parts of the content where fixed spatial layout is necessary to use or meaning.”
>  
> Is this the version that we’re reviewing for purpsoes of the CfC?
>  
> From: Joshue O Connor [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie>] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 11:10 AM
> To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org <mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
> Subject: CFC: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST.
>  
> Hi all,
> 
> Apologies but we had a resolution on this SC on a call in January but I neglected to send out the CFC to the list. Thanks to Marc Johlic for pointing this out - so I'm sending this out now. [1]
> 
> On that call  - the working group accepted the proposed SC 'Resize Content' - with minor changes. [1]
> 
> Here is a link to the issue and the most recent survey. [2] [3]
> 
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline  - 6th May 18:00 EST.
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/01/31-wai-wcag-minutes.html#resolution03 <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2017%2F01%2F31-wai-wcag-minutes.html%23resolution03&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbf73829667e84afc438f08d49301146f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636295080255073173&sdata=mRw%2BhQTrcS0OXdEk5g6s1QAW%2BHsS65fIm3PDcsBK38I%3D&reserved=0> 
> [2] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/77 <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fissues%2F77&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbf73829667e84afc438f08d49301146f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636295080255073173&sdata=uG5bPJ8rFIABSDsz%2BgL4IWN%2F0rKU1tyR9hmbZoKeHts%3D&reserved=0> 
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/SC_review_Jan2017/results <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2FSC_review_Jan2017%2Fresults&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbf73829667e84afc438f08d49301146f%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636295080255073173&sdata=6nD%2BmRwIKp3H9f35OSluhCYR2Nn33KVFLlArc3u1bwk%3D&reserved=0>
> -- 
> Joshue O Connor
> Director | InterAccess.ie 
>  
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
> 
>  
> Thank you for your compliance.
> 
> 
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
> 
> 
> Thank you for your compliance.
>