- From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 10:38:07 +0100
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- CC: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 09:38:44 UTC
Thanks Alastair - Yes, at this point based on group input/past review let us know David if you can't live with 400% or have some new information. Josh Alastair Campbell wrote: > > David wrote: > > > I suggest we drop back to 300%. > > Hi David, > > There was quite a lot of evidence, rational and justification in the > issues review [1], could you provide some for that statement? > > The comments on the amount of resize/zoom (inside and out of the WG) > seemed to fall into two camps: They were either happy with 400%, or > thought anything over 150-200% was too difficult, so I’m not sure > where 300% came from? > > Cheers, > > -Alastair > > 1] > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Resize_content_issues_review > -- Joshue O Connor Director | InterAccess.ie
Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 09:38:44 UTC