W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC

From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 10:38:07 +0100
Message-ID: <590C47FF.8030908@interaccess.ie>
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
CC: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Thanks Alastair - Yes, at this point based on group input/past review 
let us know David if you can't live with 400% or have some new information.

Josh

Alastair Campbell wrote:
>
> David wrote:
>
> > I suggest we drop back to 300%.
>
> Hi David,
>
> There was quite a lot of evidence, rational and justification in the 
> issues review [1], could you provide some for that statement?
>
> The comments on the amount of resize/zoom (inside and out of the WG) 
> seemed to fall into two camps: They were either happy with 400%, or 
> thought anything over 150-200% was too difficult, so I’m not sure 
> where 300% came from?
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Alastair
>
> 1] 
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Resize_content_issues_review
>

-- 
Joshue O Connor
Director | InterAccess.ie
Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 09:38:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:13 UTC