W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: might be last option for plain language

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 11:11:11 +0100
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <0b5542c3-b5ce-2d5e-7c27-7cb12babb2ae@splintered.co.uk>
On 18/05/2017 10:55, lisa.seeman wrote:
> I actually offered to do a few pages if the group agree that they are
> interested in this direction
> for a topic like web standards I would need to make a word list (one
> list is needed for a whole industry so it is not too bad)
> However, if we do agree to go in this direction, I will be happy to
> create word lists for ten verticals to start with (health, banking,
> technology, education...) and clear instructions on how to do it.

Who will create a list if I, as an author, work in an area that you've 
not covered? How can I test that I'm not failing this proposed SC? Same 
question if I'm an auditor...how can I determine if my client's site 
that I'm auditing is compliant?

What if there are multiple word lists for certain areas, produced by 
different people/organisations? Which one is the more authoritative, if 
I get a pass using one but a fail using another?

Who will guarantee the accuracy and maintenance of word lists? A third 
party organisation, or WAI? Who watches the watchers?

Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2017 10:11:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:13 UTC