Re: SC Managers and public comments

My question here is whether what re-drafting option you /chairs and members of WCAG would prefer:

A: adding revised draft SC text as new comment to the original issue, waiting for comments by others
B: Making the change in the SC source (via the "edit this SC" linl, which might invalidate some earlier comments)
C: adding revised SC text as comment to the issue raised to which the change is a response
D: Create an new issue for the revised text

I currently assume A and/or C is the correct approach.

Detlev


--
Detlev Fischer
testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese
Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg

Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45
Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5

http://www.testkreis.de
Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites

Joshue O Connor schrieb am 10.04.2017 13:57:

> Hi Laura,
>> 
>> 
>> Are SC Managers supposed to draft a proposed response for the public
>> comment pending official working group approval?
>> 
>> 
> Yes - that's the idea. Ideally, you can distill what you think an appropriate response is, based on group input into the SC etc
> and we will survey that to the group.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Josh
> 
>> 
>> Or we just supposed to respond as individual SC managers on the public comment?
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> Kindest Regards,
>> Laura
>> 
>> 
>> Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> 
>> 
>> 5 April 2017 at 08:44
>> 
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Andrew and I have now assigned the current tranche of public comments to the SC Managers.
>> 
>> We ask all SC managers to please review the comments for your issues, parse its contents etc - distill the substance and draft a response/any outputs etc.
>> 
>> In some cases comments have been applied to people who are not SC managers but they are usually to people who
>> have already made a reply or demonstrated some interest in the issue/comment.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> 
> --
> Joshue O Connor
> Director | InterAccess.ie
> 
>

Received on Monday, 10 April 2017 12:26:25 UTC