W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts

From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:33:02 +0200 (CEST)
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-Id: <20170420093302.A6A8468202E6@dd24924.kasserver.com>
Alastair wrote: 

> James’ technique looks good (marking font-icons with role of image), perhaps
> we can use that as a defacto-technique that meets the SC? 

I find this in the comments:

*:not([role="img"]) {
font-family: Comic Sans MS, Georgia,'Times New Roman',serif;

So would this basically be a technique *for users* who would have to update any custom stylesheets they may be using by working in this exception for elements with role=img?
Or would it be part of an alternative style sheet offered by the author via a style switcher?
I guess there is nothing authors can do to safely exempt icon fonts from any manipulation by user style sheets that fail to cater for icon fonts this way, correct?
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2017 09:33:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:12 UTC