W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft

From: Alex Li (CELA) <alli@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 18:17:16 +0000
To: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <MWHPR21MB01595E977DB8E201B16F5081C9D80@MWHPR21MB0159.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Are keyboards device sensors? If so, this SC seems to conflict with 2.1.1. If not, then what makes keyboards not device sensor?

From: John Foliot [mailto:john.foliot@deque.com]
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 6:05 AM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft

> DF: You may be right here - I would not be against discussing this again in one of the next telcos following your objection - what is the WG protocol in these cases?

In the absence of a specific protocol, I too agree that we may have been a bit hasty, and that further discussion is warranted here. Josh and Andrew, can this topic be re-added to the agenda for Tuesday 6/27? Steve has raised valid points which I believe warrant the additional review. Thanks!

> The same would be required should advanced web apps draw on fingerprint readers, face detection, voise detection etc (I have not seen any that do that but it seems feasible / likely to happen).

These are happening now: "OK Google", (Cortana, Siri, Alexa) for speech input that commences a more complex action (searching), and I now have multiple apps on my cell phone that allows for my thumb-print to "log-in". The future is now :-)

JF

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org<mailto:shadi@w3.org>> wrote:
+1


On 20/06/2017 19:04, Joshue O Connor wrote:
Call For Consensus — ends FridayJune 23rd at 1:00pmBoston time.

The Working Group has reviewed and approved a Success Criterion for inclusion in the Editor’s Draft: "Device Sensors" with the goal of obtaining additional input external to the working group.

NOTE: The resolution  was to Accept this SC into editors draft and include a note to say that the preference of the group is to alter an existing SC rather than add a new one.

SC TEXT:

"All functionality of the content can be operated without requiring specific device sensor information unless the device sensor is essential for the function and not using it would invalidate the activity."

Survey results:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/Top3_18Apr2017/results

GIT Hub: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/67


The new SC can be reviewed here:
https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/device-sensors_ISSUE-67/guidelines/sc/21/device-sensors.html


If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Thanks

--
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/

Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)



--
John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Strategist
Deque Systems Inc.
john.foliot@deque.com<mailto:john.foliot@deque.com>

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Friday, 23 June 2017 18:17:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:13 UTC