W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

RE: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag

From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:49:42 +0000
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
CC: "W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BN6PR07MB3457EC7EED3DBDC675015909ABDB0@BN6PR07MB3457.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>

From: Alastair Campbell [mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 6:00 AM

Customisation which affects colour and text-size are relatively common, but as I outlined before [1] things which alter the layout and navigation are a step up, and I’m interested in current examples of that.
[Jason] I am similarly interested. As has been pointed out to me in more than one discussion of personalization (including conversations in W3C contexts), we also need to be mindful of the associated privacy challenges and the potential for exploitation that they create unless managed appropriately in the personalization architecture.
A set of individual preferences supplied by a user to support personalization doesn’t, strictly speaking, assert anything about a person’s disability; but I’m sure that inferences can often be drawn with a high degree of probability – surely even more so if the preferences are combined with data from other sources.


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.

Thank you for your compliance.

Received on Thursday, 22 June 2017 13:50:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:13 UTC