- From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 13:30:42 +0100
- To: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
- CC: laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com, akirkpat@adobe.com, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-ID: <58EB7AF2.40908@interaccess.ie>
IIRC we had agreed to update the original issue. Andrew - is this correct? Thanks Josh > Detlev Fischer <mailto:detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> > 10 April 2017 at 13:25 > My question here is whether what re-drafting option you /chairs and > members of WCAG would prefer: > > A: adding revised draft SC text as new comment to the original issue, > waiting for comments by others > B: Making the change in the SC source (via the "edit this SC" linl, > which might invalidate some earlier comments) > C: adding revised SC text as comment to the issue raised to which the > change is a response > D: Create an new issue for the revised text > > I currently assume A and/or C is the correct approach. > > Detlev > > > -- > Detlev Fischer > testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese > Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg > > Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45 > Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5 > > http://www.testkreis.de > Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites > > > Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> > 10 April 2017 at 12:57 > Hi Laura, >> Are SC Managers supposed to draft a proposed response for the public >> comment pending official working group approval? > Yes - that's the idea. Ideally, you can distill what you think an > appropriate response is, based on group input into the SC etc > and we will survey that to the group. > > Thanks > > Josh > >> >> Or we just supposed to respond as individual SC managers on the >> public comment? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Kindest Regards, >> Laura >> >> >> Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> >> 5 April 2017 at 08:44 >> Hi all, >> >> Andrew and I have now assigned the current tranche of public comments >> to the SC Managers. >> >> We ask all SC managers to please review the comments for your issues, >> parse its contents etc - distill the substance and draft a >> response/any outputs etc. >> >> In some cases comments have been applied to people who are not SC >> managers but they are usually to people who >> have already made a reply or demonstrated some interest in the >> issue/comment. >> >> Thanks >> > > Laura Carlson <mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> > 10 April 2017 at 12:41 > Hi Josh and Andrew, > > Are SC Managers supposed to draft a proposed response for the public > comment pending official working group approval? > > Or we just supposed to respond as individual SC managers on the public > comment? > > Thank you. > > Kindest Regards, > Laura > > > Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> > 5 April 2017 at 08:44 > Hi all, > > Andrew and I have now assigned the current tranche of public comments > to the SC Managers. > > We ask all SC managers to please review the comments for your issues, > parse its contents etc - distill the substance and draft a > response/any outputs etc. > > In some cases comments have been applied to people who are not SC > managers but they are usually to people who > have already made a reply or demonstrated some interest in the > issue/comment. > > Thanks > -- Joshue O Connor Director | InterAccess.ie
Received on Monday, 10 April 2017 12:31:22 UTC