w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from April to June 2017 by date

Friday, 30 June 2017

• Re: Professional communication / Keeping emotions in check Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Personalisation examples (Was: Re: should we say "critical controls" or just "controls") White, Jason J
• Re: Personalisation examples (Was: Re: should we say "critical controls" or just "controls") David MacDonald
• Re: Personalisation examples (Was: Re: should we say "critical controls" or just "controls") Alastair Campbell
• Personalisation examples (Was: Re: should we say "critical controls" or just "controls") Detlev Fischer
• Re: Personalisation: meta-data vs button(s) on page David MacDonald
• Personalisation: meta-data vs button(s) on page Alastair Campbell
• link to the simple demo for personlization lisa.seeman
• Re: should we say "critical controls" or just "controls". Alastair Campbell
• Re: should we say "critical controls" or just "controls". Detlev Fischer

Thursday, 29 June 2017

• RE: should we say "critical controls" or just "controls". Alastair Campbell
• Re: Professional communication / Keeping emotions in check lisa.seeman
• Re: Issues with Target Size SC Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Issues with Target Size SC Repsher, Stephen J
• Professional communication / Keeping emotions in check Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Thursday call minutes Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting, Thursday June 29, 2017 Alastair Campbell
• Issues with Target Size SC Joshue O Connor
• WCAG-ACTION-338: Put together a draft template of structure Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting, Thursday June 29, 2017 Laura Carlson
• Extra AGWG meeting, Thursday June 29, 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: should we say "critical controls" or just "controls". Alastair Campbell
• Re: I think Issue #63 should be looked at fairly soon. Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: Adapting text CFC Laura Carlson
• 6/29/17 AGWG call Christopher Loiselle
• I think Issue #63 should be looked at fairly soon. David MacDonald
• Re: Adapting text CFC Joshue O Connor

Wednesday, 28 June 2017

• RE: Adapting text CFC White, Jason J
• Re: Adapting text CFC Laura Carlson

Tuesday, 27 June 2017

• Re: should we say "critical controls" or just "controls". John Foliot
• RE: should we say "critical controls" or just "controls". White, Jason J
• Re: should we say "critical controls" or just "controls". Patrick H. Lauke
• should we say "critical controls" or just "controls". lisa.seeman
• Minutes for AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Christopher Loiselle
• Re: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Jeanne Spellman
• RE: How long /hard is it to install the personlization. Denis Boudreau
• Re: How long /hard is it to install the personlization. lisa.seeman
• Re: How long /hard is it to install the personlization. David MacDonald
• Re: How long /hard is it to install the personlization. Alastair Campbell
• Re: How long /hard is it to install the personlization. lisa.seeman
• Re: How long /hard is it to install the personlization. Alastair Campbell
• Re: How long /hard is it to install the personlization. lisa.seeman

Monday, 26 June 2017

• Re: How long /hard is it to install the personlization. John Foliot
• Re: How long /hard is it to install the personlization. lisa.seeman
• RE: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Denis Boudreau
• Re: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 26 June 2017 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Joshue O Connor
• Re: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 lisa.seeman
• RE: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Jim Allan
• RE: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Denis Boudreau
• Re: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Glenda Sims
• RE: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: How long /hard is it to install the personlization. Alastair Campbell
• How long /hard is it to install the personlization. lisa.seeman
• Re: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Detlev Fischer
• RE: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Abma, J.D. (Jake)

Sunday, 25 June 2017

• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication Alastair Campbell

Friday, 23 June 2017

• RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Alex Li (CELA)
• RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• RE: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Alex Li (CELA)
• RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Alex Li (CELA)
• Re: CFC Add Accessible authentication into Editors Draft Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Joshue O Connor
• Re: AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 Wilco Fiers
• Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft John Foliot
• Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Shadi Abou-Zahra
• AGWG meeting June 27th, 2017 josh@interaccess.ie
• Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Detlev Fischer
• Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft David MacDonald
• Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Detlev Fischer
• RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Repsher, Stephen J

Thursday, 22 June 2017

• When is the next Public Working Draft going to be published? Glenda Sims
• Re: Editorial note (was RE: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft) Glenda Sims
• RE: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag EA Draffan
• Re: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag Christophe Strobbe
• Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft David MacDonald
• Re: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Chris Loiselle
• MINUTES: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Michael Gower
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag lisa.seeman
• RE: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft John Foliot
• CFC Add Accessible Name (was Speech Input) to editors draft Joshue O Connor
• Updated WebEx information for Tuesday AG WG call Michael Cooper
• RE: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag Alastair Campbell
• Re: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag Michael Pluke
• Re: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag Alastair Campbell
• Re: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag lisa.seeman
• RE: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 lisa.seeman
• RE: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag White, Jason J
• RE: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 EA Draffan
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Pietro Cirrincione
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Christopher Loiselle
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Laura Carlson
• Re: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag Alastair Campbell
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Detlev Fischer

Wednesday, 21 June 2017

• Re: CFC Add Accessible authentication into Editors Draft David MacDonald
• Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft David MacDonald
• Re: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft David MacDonald
• Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft David MacDonald
• RE: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag White, Jason J
• RE: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag James Nurthen
• Fwd: Long list of sites that use personalization to meet wcag lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft John Foliot
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft John Foliot
• Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 22nd, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• RE: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Denis Boudreau
• RE: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Denis Boudreau
• RE: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft Denis Boudreau
• RE: CFC Add Accessible authentication into Editors Draft alands289@gmail.com
• RE: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft alands289@gmail.com
• Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Chris Loiselle
• RE: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft alands289@gmail.com
• Re: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Chris Loiselle
• Re: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft Laura Carlson
• RE: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• RE: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft Wilco Fiers
• Re: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Wilco Fiers
• Re: CFC Add Accessible authentication into Editors Draft Detlev Fischer
• Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Detlev Fischer
• Re: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Detlev Fischer
• Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft Detlev Fischer
• RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Mike Elledge

Tuesday, 20 June 2017

• Re: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Marc Johlic
• RE: CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Kathy Wahlbin
• RE: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft James Nurthen
• Editorial issues (was RE: CFC Add Accessible authentication into Editors Draft) White, Jason J
• Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft Jim Allan
• Re: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Jim Allan
• Editorial note (was RE: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft) White, Jason J
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Marc Johlic
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC Add Accessible authentication into Editors Draft Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft James Nurthen
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 James Nurthen
• CFC Add Device Sensors to Editors Draft Joshue O Connor
• CFC Add User Interface Component Contrast (Minimum) to Editors Draft Joshue O Connor
• CFC Add Accessible authentication into Editors Draft Joshue O Connor
• CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft Joshue O Connor
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• RE: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Some of the security people consulted - was RE: Next steps for accessible authentication Alastair Campbell
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication John Foliot
• Some of the security people consulted - was RE: Next steps for accessible authentication lisa.seeman
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication Janina Sajka
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication Alastair Campbell
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Temp WebEx today: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Michael Cooper
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Christopher Loiselle
• RE: Next steps for accessible authentication lisa.seeman
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 lisa.seeman
• RE: Next steps for accessible authentication White, Jason J
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication Michael Pluke
• RE: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Jonathan Avila
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication Alastair Campbell
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 lisa.seeman
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication lisa.seeman
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication lisa.seeman
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication lisa.seeman
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Denis Boudreau
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication lisa.seeman
• RE: Next steps for accessible authentication lisa.seeman

Monday, 19 June 2017

• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 James Nurthen
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Shawn Lauriat
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication Alastair Campbell
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Next steps for accessible authentication White, Jason J
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication John Foliot
• RE: Next steps for accessible authentication White, Jason J
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication lisa.seeman
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 David MacDonald
• RE: Next steps for accessible authentication lisa.seeman
• RE: Next steps for accessible authentication White, Jason J
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 19 June 2017 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• RE: Next steps for accessible authentication White, Jason J
• RE: Next steps for accessible authentication lisa.seeman
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication lisa.seeman

Friday, 16 June 2017

• AGWG meeting June 20th, 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Thursday, 15 June 2017

• RE: Next steps for accessible authentication White, Jason J
• Re: Next steps for accessible authentication Alastair Campbell
• Minutes for Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 15th, 2017 Michael Gower
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 15th, 2017 Michael Gower
• TPAC 2017 registration now open Michael Cooper
• COGA survey - Accessible Authentication Joshue O Connor
• TPAC schedule and registration - book your flights! Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 15th, 2017 Pietro Cirrincione

Wednesday, 14 June 2017

• RE: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 15th, 2017 EA Draffan
• RE: Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 15th, 2017 Michael Pluke
• Extra AGWG meeting Thurs June 15th, 2017 Joshue O Connor

Tuesday, 13 June 2017

• RE: Discussion - Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Can we put "help and support" into the wcag draft White, Jason J
• Re: Discussion - Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft John Foliot
• RE: Discussion - Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft White, Jason J
• Re: Can we put "help and support" into the wcag draft Detlev Fischer
• Re: AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 Jeanne Spellman
• Re: Discussion - Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Marc Johlic
• [CANCELLED] Updated AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: Discussion - Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Joshue O Connor
• Discussion - Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Joshue O Connor
• RE: CFC - Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: CFC - Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Joshue O Connor
• RE: Updated AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 Chris Loiselle
• RE: CFC - Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft White, Jason J
• Re: CFC - Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Joshue O Connor
• Re: Updated AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• RE: Updated AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.

Monday, 12 June 2017

• Re: CFC: Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC: Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Glenda Sims
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 12 June 2017 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• RE: Updated AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 EA Draffan
• RE: AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: Updated AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 Bailey, Bruce
• should we work on "help and support" another week? lisa.seeman
• Re: Can we put "help and support" into the wcag draft lisa.seeman

Saturday, 10 June 2017

• Re: Proposal: We need to identify whether a proposed SC applies broadly David MacDonald
• Re: Proposal: We need to identify whether a proposed SC applies broadly Gregg C Vanderheiden

Friday, 9 June 2017

• RE: Updated AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 Michael Pluke
• Survey on WAI Accessible Media Tutorial Michael Cooper
• Re: AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 David MacDonald
• Re: Stripping CFC from subject lines Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 John Foliot
• Stripping CFC from subject lines Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC: Approval process for Understanding documents Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: CFC: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Updated AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Orientation comments analysis Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Orientation comments analysis White, Jason J
• RE: Orientation comments analysis White, Jason J
• RE: Orientation comments analysis White, Jason J
• RE: AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 Jonathan Avila
• AGWG meeting June 13th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: Orientation comments analysis Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Proposal: We need to identify whether a proposed SC applies broadly lisa.seeman

Thursday, 8 June 2017

• RE: Orientation comments analysis Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Orientation comments analysis Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Orientation comments analysis Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Can we put "help and support" into the wcag draft White, Jason J
• RE: Orientation comments analysis White, Jason J
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Sailesh Panchang
• Orientation comments analysis Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Can we put "help and support" into the wcag draft lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC: Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Wilco Fiers
• Re: CFC: Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft David MacDonald
• Minutes AG Meeting, June 8th Wilco Fiers
• Re: CFC: Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC: Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Work
• RE: CFC: Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Kathy Wahlbin
• RE: CFC: Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Chris Loiselle
• CFC: Add Orientation SC to Editor's Draft Joshue O Connor
• RE: Approval process for Understanding documents alands289@gmail.com
• RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft alands289@gmail.com
• Re: CFC: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Marc Johlic
• RE: CFC: Approval process for Understanding documents kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: CFC: Approval process for Understanding documents Marc Johlic
• Re: Further discussion on Change of Content SC Sailesh Panchang

Wednesday, 7 June 2017

• Re: Zoom content updates Pt3 Jim Allan
• Re: Further discussion on Change of Content SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: Approval process for Understanding documents Laura Carlson
• Re: Further discussion on Change of Content SC Sailesh Panchang
• Further discussion on Change of Content SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Kim Patch
• Re: Bad link? Jonathan Avila
• Re: Bad link? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Bad link? Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Question about email clients and "CFC" in the message subject Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Sign up to Scribe! AGWG needs you! Mike Elledge
• RE: Question about email clients and "CFC" in the message subject Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Question about email clients and "CFC" in the message subject Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: Bad link? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Question about email clients and "CFC" in the message subject Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Bad link? Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Bad link? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Joshue O Connor
• RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Joshue O Connor
• RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft John Foliot
• Re: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Joshue O Connor
• RE: Approval process for Understanding documents Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: CFC: Approval process for Understanding documents Detlev Fischer
• Re: CFC: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Detlev Fischer
• Re: CFC: Approval process for Understanding documents John Foliot
• Re: AGWG meeting June 8, 2017 at 11:30 ET Laura Carlson
• The request to return font family bullet to the Adapting Text SC (was Re: Font Width Arabic Fonts on Google Fonts) Laura Carlson
• RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft White, Jason J
• RE: Approval process for Understanding documents Chris Loiselle
• RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Chris Loiselle
• RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft David MacDonald
• Re: Sign up to Scribe! AGWG needs you! Wilco Fiers
• Re: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Wilco Fiers
• Re: Approval process for Understanding documents Wilco Fiers
• Re: Approval process for Understanding documents Alastair Campbell
• RE: Font Width Arabic Fonts on Google Fonts EA Draffan
• RE: Approval process for Understanding documents Chakravarthula, Srinivasu
• RE: CFC: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Chakravarthula, Srinivasu
• RE: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Font Width Arabic Fonts on Google Fonts Wayne Dick
• RE: Approval process for Understanding documents Denis Boudreau
• AGWG meeting June 8, 2017 at 11:30 ET Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: CFC: Approval process for Understanding documents Katie Haritos-Shea
• CFC: Approval process for Understanding documents Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC: Add Character Key Shortcuts to Editor's Draft Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Andrew Kirkpatrick

Tuesday, 6 June 2017

• Orientation essential examples Alex Li (CELA)
• Character shortcuts & blind or low vision Repsher, Stephen J
• Sign up to Scribe! AGWG needs you! Glenda Sims
• Meeting minutes Andrew Kirkpatrick
• MINUTES of AGWG meeting June 6, 2017 Glenda Sims
• TPAC dates Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: AGWG meeting June 6th, 2017 Mike Elledge
• Re: AGWG meeting June 6th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 5 June 2017 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: AGWG meeting June 6th, 2017 Shawn Lauriat
• Re: AGWG meeting June 6th, 2017 EA Draffan
• Re: AGWG meeting June 6th, 2017 Detlev Fischer
• Re:grets AGWG meeting June 6th, 2017 Jim Allan
• Re: Zoom content updates Pt3 Joshue O Connor
• Re: Revised Wording for COGA Issue #32: Help lisa.seeman
• Re: Zoom content updates Pt3 Alastair Campbell
• Discussing modern css accessibility techniques Shwetank Dixit
• Revised Wording for COGA Issue #32: Help McSorley, Jan

Monday, 5 June 2017

• RE: Zoom content updates Pt2 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: Zoom content updates Pt2 Alastair Campbell
• Re: Zoom content updates Pt2 David MacDonald
• Re: Zoom content updates Pt2 Alastair Campbell
• Re: Zoom content updates Pt2 Alastair Campbell
• Re: Zoom content updates Pt2 David MacDonald
• RE: Zoom content updates Pt2 White, Jason J
• Re: Zoom content updates Pt2 Alastair Campbell
• RE: Zoom content updates Pt2 White, Jason J
• Re: Zoom content updates Pt2 David MacDonald
• Correct TinyURL for the summary spreadsheet David MacDonald
• Re: Zoom content updates Pt2 Alastair Campbell

Saturday, 3 June 2017

• RE: AGWG meeting June 6th, 2017 Kathy Wahlbin
• AGWG meeting June 6th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: Spreadsheet updated Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Spreadsheet updated David MacDonald

Friday, 2 June 2017

• RE: help with voting wcag@scotiatec.com
• RE: help with voting Milliken, Neil
• Re: CJK Letters some questions so I can compute font family sizes. Wayne Dick

Thursday, 1 June 2017

• Re: CJK Letters some questions so I can compute font family sizes. John Foliot
• Re: CJK Letters some questions so I can compute font family sizes. Christophe Strobbe
• MINUTES of AGWG meeting June 1, 2017 at 11:30 ET Detlev Fischer
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Marc Johlic
• RE: AGWG meeting June 1, 2017 at 11:30 ET Michael Pluke
• Re: help with voting Andrew Kirkpatrick
• help with voting lisa.seeman
• Re: AGWG meeting June 1, 2017 at 11:30 ET Joshue O Connor
• Re: RE: AGWG meeting June 1, 2017 at 11:30 ET lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Sailesh Panchang

Wednesday, 31 May 2017

• CJK Letters some questions so I can compute font family sizes. Wayne Dick
• RE: AGWG meeting June 1, 2017 at 11:30 ET EA Draffan
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC David MacDonald
• Re: AGWG meeting June 1, 2017 at 11:30 ET Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Mean character width for 16px Google Fonts (818 Families) Laura Carlson
• RE: CFC: Change of Content SC White, Jason J
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC David MacDonald
• Re: Mean character width for 16px Google Fonts (818 Families) Laura Carlson
• Re: Mean character width for 16px Google Fonts (818 Families) Laura Carlson
• Re: Mean character width for 16px Google Fonts (818 Families) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Mean character width for 16px Google Fonts (818 Families) Wayne Dick
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Sailesh Panchang

Tuesday, 30 May 2017

• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC David MacDonald
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC David MacDonald
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Sailesh Panchang
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Detlev Fischer
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC John Foliot
• RE: CFC: Change of Content SC White, Jason J
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Change of Content SC alands289@gmail.com
• Re: AGWG meeting June 1, 2017 at 11:30 ET Chris Loiselle
• AGWG meeting June 1, 2017 at 11:30 ET Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC David MacDonald
• Re: CFC: Change of Content SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Change of Content SC Chris Loiselle
• RE: Change of Content SC Kathy Wahlbin
• RE: Change of Content SC Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• CFC: Change of Content SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• MINUTES Re: AGWG call at 11:00am ET, May 30, 2017 Detlev Fischer
• Re: Mean character width for 16px Google Fonts (818 Families) Laura Carlson
• RE: Mean character width for 16px Google Fonts (818 Families) Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: AGWG meeting May 30, 2017 Pietro Cirrincione
• Re: AGWG meeting May 30, 2017 Marc Johlic
• RE: AGWG meeting May 30, 2017 Bailey, Bruce
• Re: AGWG meeting May 30, 2017 EA Draffan
• Mean character width for 16px Google Fonts (818 Families) Wayne Dick
• Re: AGWG meeting May 30, 2017 James Nurthen
• Updated: AGWG meeting May 30, 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Monday, 29 May 2017

• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: AGWG meeting May 30, 2017 Michael Pluke
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC David MacDonald
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Detlev Fischer
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward lisa.seeman
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 29 May 2017 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC David MacDonald
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Patrick H. Lauke
• AGWG meeting May 30, 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Detlev Fischer
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC David MacDonald

Sunday, 28 May 2017

• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Detlev Fischer
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Jonathan Avila
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Jonathan Avila
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Jonathan Avila
• RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Jonathan Avila
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Gregg C Vanderheiden

Friday, 26 May 2017

• Re: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Milliken, Neil
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Alastair Campbell
• Re: Target Size SCs issue feedback John Foliot
• RE: Target Size SCs issue feedback Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC White, Jason J
• RE: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC White, Jason J
• RE: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward White, Jason J
• RE: Target Size SCs issue feedback Joshue O Connor
• RE: Target Size SCs issue feedback White, Jason J
• RE: Target Size SCs issue feedback Joshue O Connor
• Re: Target Size SCs issue feedback Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Thad
• RE: Target Size SCs issue feedback Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 White, Jason J
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Michael Cooper
• Re: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Jonathan Avila
• RE: Zoom content updates Jonathan Avila
• Target Size SCs issue feedback Joshue O Connor
• Re: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Joshue O Connor
• Re: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Milliken, Neil
• Re: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden

Thursday, 25 May 2017

• Zoom content updates Alastair Campbell
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward John Foliot
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Michael Cooper
• WCAG WG Meeting Minutes May 25, 2017 Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Marc Johlic
• Re: AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Actual call-in info for today's call Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Pietro Cirrincione
• RE: AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Alex Li (CELA)
• Re: AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Alastair Campbell
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Michael Pluke
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Mike Elledge
• RE: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward White, Jason J
• Re: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 David MacDonald
• Re: AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Chris Loiselle
• RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Alastair Campbell
• RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Smith, Jim
• RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 EA Draffan
• RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Milliken, Neil
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Sailesh Panchang

Wednesday, 24 May 2017

• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward David MacDonald
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward David MacDonald
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Denis Boudreau (Deque)
• RE: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Michael Pluke
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Greg Lowney
• Re: AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Detlev Fischer
• AGWG meeting May 25, 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Detlev Fischer
• Re: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Milliken, Neil
• RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Proposal for moving COGA SC forward Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Alternative approach for Plain Language John Foliot
• RE: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 White, Jason J
• RE: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Michael Pluke
• Re: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Detlev Fischer
• RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Jonathan Avila
• RE: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Alternative approach for Plain Language Michael Gower
• Re: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Alastair Campbell
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 lisa.seeman
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Detlev Fischer
• Re: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Alastair Campbell
• Re: Target size alternative Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Target size alternative Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Alternative approach for Plain Language Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Gregg C Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 23 May 2017

• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Glenda Sims
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Melanie Philipp
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Melanie Philipp
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Jim Allan
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Kathy Wahlbin
• RE: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Detlev Fischer
• RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 alands289@gmail.com
• RE: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC alands289@gmail.com
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Jim Allan
• RE: Alternative approach for Plain Language White, Jason J
• Re: CFC: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Denis Boudreau (Deque)
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Denis Boudreau (Deque)
• Alternative approach for Plain Language Michael Gower
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Laura Carlson
• RE: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Kathy Wahlbin
• Re: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Wilco Fiers
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Wilco Fiers
• RE: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Chris Loiselle
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 David MacDonald
• Re: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC David MacDonald
• Re: Target size alternative David MacDonald
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC David MacDonald
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 22 May 2017 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• AG Meeting Minutes 23 May 2017 Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Chris Loiselle
• RE: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Target Size' Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Target Size' Joshue O Connor
• RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• RE: Target size alternative Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Target Size' Joshue O Connor
• CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Target Size' Joshue O Connor
• CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Jim Allan
• Re: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Alastair Campbell
• RE: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 John Foliot
• CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: TPAC2017 - Book flights and hotel NOW if approved to go Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: TPAC2017 - Book flights and hotel NOW if approved to go David MacDonald
• Re: TPAC2017 - Book flights and hotel NOW if approved to go Michael Cooper
• Re: CFC: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata Jim Allan
• Re: Combining the two.... Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language lisa.seeman
• Re: Updated: AGWG meeting May 23 2017 Pietro Cirrincione
• Re: Combining the two.... Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language John Foliot
• Re: TPAC2017 - Book flights and hotel NOW if approved to go Andrew Kirkpatrick
• TPAC2017 - Book flights and hotel NOW if approved to go Michael Cooper
• RE: Target size alternative White, Jason J
• RE: issue #60 target size: addressing unstyled native controls White, Jason J
• Re: issue #60 target size: addressing unstyled native controls Detlev Fischer
• Target size alternative Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: issue #60 target size: addressing unstyled native controls White, Jason J
• RE: issue #60 target size: addressing unstyled native controls Kathy Wahlbin
• issue #60 target size: addressing unstyled native controls Detlev Fischer
• Combining the two.... Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language lisa.seeman
• Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language lisa.seeman
• Re: Updated: AGWG meeting May 23 2017 Michael Pluke
• Agenda+ Target size discussion/legacy content and WCAG 2.1 Joshue O Connor

Monday, 22 May 2017

• RE: AGWG meeting May 23 2017 Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata White, Jason J
• RE: AGWG meeting May 23 2017 Bailey, Bruce
• RE: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: CFC: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata Glenda Sims
• RE: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language White, Jason J
• Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language White, Jason J
• Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Detlev Fischer
• Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language lisa.seeman
• Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language Alastair Campbell
• Do we like this better? - was way to move forward with plain language lisa.seeman
• Re: language step by step: - was Re: might be last option for plain language John Foliot
• Re: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata Alastair Campbell

Sunday, 21 May 2017

• Re: CFC: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata Chris Loiselle
• language step by step: - was Re: might be last option for plain language lisa.seeman

Saturday, 20 May 2017

• Re: CFC: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata Sailesh Panchang
• RE: CFC: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata Jonathan Avila

Friday, 19 May 2017

• Re: CFC: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata David MacDonald
• Re: CFC: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata David MacDonald
• Re: CFC: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata John Foliot
• CFC: 1.3.3/1.4.1 Errata Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Re[2]: GitHub accessibility improvements David MacDonald
• Updated: AGWG meeting May 23 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Resize content - questions remaining Repsher, Stephen J
• Re[2]: GitHub accessibility improvements josh@interaccess.ie
• Re: GitHub accessibility improvements Eric Eggert
• AGWG meeting May 23 2017 Joshue O Connor
• RE: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: Resize content - questions remaining Gregg C Vanderheiden

Thursday, 18 May 2017

• Re: GitHub accessibility improvements John Foliot
• Re: GitHub accessibility improvements Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Legacy content - requirement for conformance to WCAG 2.1? Alistair Duggin
• Re: GitHub accessibility improvements Andrew Kirkpatrick
• GitHub accessibility improvements Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Quick question, is WCAG 2.1 working draft being published monthly (or every other month)? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Quick question, is WCAG 2.1 working draft being published monthly (or every other month)? Glenda Sims
• Legacy content - requirement for conformance to WCAG 2.1? Detlev Fischer
• MInutes for AGWG Thursday call on May 18, 2017 Detlev Fischer
• Re: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 John Foliot
• Re: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 Marc Johlic
• RE: Resize content - questions remaining Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Resize content - questions remaining Alastair Campbell
• Re: Resize content - questions remaining David MacDonald
• Re: Resize content - questions remaining Alastair Campbell
• RE: Resize content - questions remaining Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: might be last option for plain language John Foliot
• Resize content - questions remaining Alastair Campbell
• Re: might be last option for plain language Michael Pluke
• Re: might be last option for plain language Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: might be last option for plain language lisa.seeman

Wednesday, 17 May 2017

• Re: changes to plain language based on the feedback lisa.seeman
• Re: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 Sailesh Panchang
• Thursday call for AGWG at 11:30am ET May 18 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 Kathy Wahlbin
• RE: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 Jonathan Avila
• Re: might be last option for plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: we need to quantify what the issues can not be meet for plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: we need to quantify what the issues can not be meet for plain language lisa.seeman
• RE: we need to quantify what the issues can not be meet for plain language White, Jason J
• Re: we need to quantify what the issues can not be meet for plain language Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Re[2]: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 White, Jason J
• Re: Re[2]: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• Re[2]: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 josh@interaccess.ie
• Re: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 David MacDonald
• Re: we need to quantify what the issues can not be meet for plain language David MacDonald
• Re: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 Laura Carlson
• Re: might be last option for plain language Alastair Campbell
• Re: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 Patrick H. Lauke
• we need to quantify what the issues can not be meet for plain language lisa.seeman
• RE: might be last option for plain language lisa.seeman
• Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Tuesday, 16 May 2017

• RE: might be last option for plain language White, Jason J
• RE: might be last option for plain language White, Jason J
• Re: might be last option for plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: might be last option for plain language White, Jason J
• Re: might be last option for plain language Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: might be last option for plain language White, Jason J
• Re: might be last option for plain language David MacDonald
• RE: might be last option for plain language White, Jason J
• might be last option for plain language lisa.seeman
• Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference : 16 May 2017 , Minutes Michael Pluke
• RE: changes to plain language based on the feedback White, Jason J
• Re: AGWG meeting May 16, 2017 Greg Lowney
• Re: Issue #69: Character key commands David MacDonald
• RE: AGWG meeting May 16, 2017 Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Issue #69: Character key commands Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Issue #69: Character key commands David MacDonald
• Re: Issue #69: Character key commands Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Issue #69: Character key commands Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Issue #69: Character key commands Michael Gower
• Re: changes to plain language based on the feedback John Foliot
• Re: AGWG meeting May 16, 2017 Shawn Lauriat
• RE: Issue #69: Character key commands Jonathan Avila
• Re: Issue #69: Character key commands John Foliot
• Re: AGWG meeting May 16, 2017 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Re: Issue #69: Character key commands Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Issue #69: Character key commands Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Issue #69: Character key commands Greg Lowney

Monday, 15 May 2017

• RE: changes to plain language based on the feedback White, Jason J
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: changes to plain language based on the feedback Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: changes to plain language based on the feedback Gregg C Vanderheiden
• changes to plain language based on the feedback lisa.seeman
• Re: [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 15 May 2017 Alistair Garrison
• Re: AGWG meeting May 16, 2017 Pietro
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 15 May 2017 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: AGWG meeting May 16, 2017 Glenda Sims
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Michael Pluke
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Schnabel, Stefan

Saturday, 13 May 2017

• Re: Request for Review and Comment: Confirm Important Information (Issue #33) Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Request for Review and Comment: Confirm Important Information (Issue #33) White, Jason J

Friday, 12 May 2017

• Re: Request for Review and Comment: Confirm Important Information (Issue #33) James Nurthen
• RE: Request for Review and Comment: Confirm Important Information (Issue #33) Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: Request for Review and Comment: Confirm Important Information (Issue #33) James Nurthen
• RE: Request for Review and Comment: Confirm Important Information (Issue #33) Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: Request for Review and Comment: Confirm Important Information (Issue #33) James Nurthen
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Request for Review and Comment: Confirm Important Information (Issue #33) Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Request for Review and Comment: Confirm Important Information (Issue #33) Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Repsher, Stephen J
• AGWG meeting May 16, 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts White, Jason J
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Schnabel, Stefan
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts White, Jason J
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Schnabel, Stefan
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Schnabel, Stefan
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden

Thursday, 11 May 2017

• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden
• MINUTES Re: Thursday call for AGWG at 11:30am ET May 11 John Foliot
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Repsher, Stephen J
• RE: Thursday call for AGWG at 11:30am ET May 11 Alex Li (CELA)
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: Thursday call for AGWG at 11:30am ET May 11 Pietro
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts alands289@gmail.com
• Re: Thursday call for AGWG at 11:30am ET May 11 Alex Li (CELA)
• Re: Thursday call for AGWG at 11:30am ET May 11 Alastair Campbell
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Michael Pluke
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts White, Jason J
• Re: Thursday call for AGWG at 11:30am ET May 11 Christopher Loiselle
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts alands289@gmail.com
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Michael Pluke
• Re: Thursday call for AGWG at 11:30am ET May 11 Laura Carlson
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald

Wednesday, 10 May 2017

• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Thursday call for AGWG at 11:30am ET May 11 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: OFF TOPIC (was Re: proposed change of language for common words) Joshue O Connor
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts White, Jason J
• Re: Feedback on changes to Minimize User Errors Michael Gower
• Feedback on changes to Minimize User Errors Michael Gower
• OFF TOPIC (was Re: proposed change of language for common words) John Foliot
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 9 May 2017

• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts White, Jason J
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts alands289@gmail.com
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald
• RE: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts David MacDonald
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts John Foliot
• Follow up from the meeting on Issue 14: timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference : 09 May 2017 , Minutes Christopher Loiselle
• Re: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: AGWG meeting May 9th, 2017 Marc Johlic
• Re: AGWG meeting May 9th, 2017 Denis Boudreau (Deque)
• Re: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts lisa.seeman
• RE: AGWG meeting May 9th, 2017 Bailey, Bruce
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC David MacDonald
• Please remove from list serve Barry Johnson
• Please remove from this list server Barry Johnson
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Greg Lowney

Monday, 8 May 2017

• Re: Understanding content now set up in WCAG 2.1 repository Laura Carlson
• Re: Understanding content now set up in WCAG 2.1 repository Michael Cooper
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Understanding content now set up in WCAG 2.1 repository Laura Carlson
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC David MacDonald
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts lisa.seeman
• Fwd: Re: AGWG meeting May 9th, 2017 lisa.seeman
• Re: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts John Foliot
• Re: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts Greg Lowney
• Re: is this a way forward for familiar design? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 8 May 2017 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC David MacDonald
• Re: AGWG meeting May 9th, 2017 Shawn Lauriat
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Alastair Campbell
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. Alastair Campbell
• Re: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: CFC: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. Marc Johlic

Sunday, 7 May 2017

• RE: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts Michael Pluke
• RE: AGWG meeting May 9th, 2017 Michael Pluke
• is this a way forward for familiar design? lisa.seeman

Friday, 5 May 2017

• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: AGWG meeting May 9th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Understanding content now set up in WCAG 2.1 repository Michael Cooper
• Re: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Alastair Campbell
• Re: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts lisa.seeman
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Alastair Campbell
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC David MacDonald
• Re: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts David MacDonald
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Joshue O Connor
• AGWG meeting May 9th, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC Alastair Campbell
• Re: Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts Greg Lowney
• Can you confirm if you want the sensitive data exception for timeouts lisa.seeman
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) David Wood
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) Liam R. E. Quin
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) David Wood

Thursday, 4 May 2017

• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. David MacDonald
• Re: CFC: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. Joshue O Connor
• RE: CFC: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• RE: CFC: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. White, Jason J
• Re: CFC: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. David MacDonald
• RE: CFC: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. Jonathan Avila
• AG Meeting Minutes 4 May 2017 Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. Alastair Campbell
• RE: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 4th May 2017 Pietro
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. White, Jason J
• Re: CFC: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. Joshue O Connor
• RE: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 4th May 2017 EA Draffan
• RE: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. White, Jason J
• CFC: Issue 77 Resize Content SC - deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. Joshue O Connor
• RE: please can you update your vote kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 4th May 2017 Joshue O Connor
• RE: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) lisa.seeman
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) lisa.seeman
• Re: please can you update your vote lisa.seeman
• Re: Re: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 3rd May 2017 lisa.seeman
• Re: please can you update your vote David MacDonald
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) AUDRAIN LUC
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) Liam R. E. Quin
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) David Wood
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) Dave Cramer
• Re: please can you update your vote Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) Liam R. E. Quin
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) David Wood

Wednesday, 3 May 2017

• Re: please can you update your vote Marc Johlic
• RE: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) EA Draffan
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• RE: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) John Foliot
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) Liam R. E. Quin
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) Leonard Rosenthol
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) Alastair Campbell
• Re: Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) David MacDonald
• Re: please can you update your vote David MacDonald
• Another way forward? (Just an idea for discussion) John Foliot
• Re: please can you update your vote Marc Johlic
• Github greasemonkey script Work
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• Re: please can you update your vote David MacDonald
• Re: please can you update your vote John Foliot
• please can you update your vote lisa.seeman
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 3rd May 2017 Laura Carlson
• Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 3rd May 2017 Joshue O Connor

Tuesday, 2 May 2017

• Minutes from May 2 teleconference Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: AGWG meeting May 2, 2017 (with updated agenda) Mike Elledge
• Re: AGWG meeting May 2, 2017 (with updated agenda) Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: AGWG meeting May 2, 2017 (with updated agenda) Denis Boudreau
• Re: AGWG meeting May 2, 2017 (with updated agenda) lisa.seeman
• Re:AGWG meeting May 2, 2017 (with updated agenda) lisa.seeman
• Re: AGWG meeting May 2, 2017 (with updated agenda) Stein Erik Skotkjerra
• RE: AGWG meeting May 2, 2017 (with updated agenda) Smith, Jim
• Re: AGWG meeting May 2, 2017 (with updated agenda) Alex Li (CELA)

Monday, 1 May 2017

• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: AGWG meeting May 2, 2017 EA Draffan
• AGWG meeting May 2, 2017 (with updated agenda) Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: AGWG meeting May 2, 2017 Crystal Jones (CELA)
• AGWG meeting May 2, 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Saturday, 29 April 2017

• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? David MacDonald
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Mike Elledge
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? David MacDonald
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot

Friday, 28 April 2017

• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? White, Jason J
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? David MacDonald
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Detlev Fischer
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson
• RE: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? James Nurthen
• Meeting Minutes from 04/27/17 John Foliot
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Jonathan Avila

Thursday, 27 April 2017

• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Work
• RE: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 27th April Crystal Jones (CELA)
• Re: Correct info for Thursday call Joshue O Connor
• RE: Correct info for Thursday call Crystal Jones (CELA)
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 27th April Joshue O Connor
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 27th April David MacDonald
• Correct info for Thursday call Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 27th April Andrew Kirkpatrick
• use this link! was RE: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 27th April lisa.seeman
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• RE: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 27th April Crystal Jones (CELA)
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 27th April lisa.seeman
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Alastair Campbell
• RE: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• Resize content - initial responses Alastair Campbell
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 24 April 2017 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Laura Carlson
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Laura Carlson
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Greg Lowney
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Hakkinen, Mark T
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? James Nurthen

Wednesday, 26 April 2017

• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? David MacDonald
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? John Foliot
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? James Nurthen
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Jonathan Avila
• Re: Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Gregg Vanderheiden RTF
• Is Java Web Start covered by WCAG? Laura Carlson
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Laura Carlson
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Greg Lowney
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Laura Carlson
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Laura Carlson
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 27th April Michael Pluke
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Alastair Campbell
• Re: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 27th April EA Draffan

Tuesday, 25 April 2017

• RE: Using Markdown for Github accessibility Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 27th April Joshue O Connor
• Re: Using Markdown for Github accessibility David MacDonald
• Using Markdown for Github accessibility Wayne Dick
• Re: Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 27th April Joshue O Connor
• Extra AGWG meeting on Thurs 27th April Joshue O Connor
• WebEx broke, abandoned AG call Michael Cooper
• Call minutes April 25, 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: AGWG meeting April 25th 2017 Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: AGWG meeting April 25th 2017 Jeanne Spellman
• RE: Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Jonathan Avila
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• Can anyone not live with this sentence as the Adapting Text SC's intro? (was Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?) Laura Carlson
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell
• RE: AGWG meeting April 25th 2017 Abma, J.D. (Jake)

Monday, 24 April 2017

• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson
• Re: Appling personalisation to a site Jim Allan
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Repsher, Stephen J
• Appling personalisation to a site lisa.seeman
• Re: AGWG meeting April 25th 2017 Shawn Lauriat
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? White, Jason J
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Alastair Campbell

Sunday, 23 April 2017

• RE: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Michael Pluke
• Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies? Laura Carlson

Saturday, 22 April 2017

• Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent Gregg C Vanderheiden

Friday, 21 April 2017

• Re: Adding the word "meaning"? Wayne Dick
• Re: Adding the word "meaning"? Laura Carlson
• RE: Adding the word "meaning"? White, Jason J
• Re: Adding the word "meaning"? Alastair Campbell
• Re: Adding the word "meaning"? Joshue O Connor
• Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent Detlev Fischer
• Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent David MacDonald
• Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent David MacDonald
• RE: AGWG meeting April 25th 2017 EA Draffan
• Re: Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent Alastair Campbell
• AGWG meeting April 25th 2017 Joshue O Connor

Thursday, 20 April 2017

• Potential clarification of Web Content/User Agent Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) David MacDonald
• Re: Houston, do we have a problem? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Houston, do we have a problem? David MacDonald
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Adding the word "meaning"? John Foliot
• Houston, do we have a problem? John Foliot
• Adding the word "meaning"? Laura Carlson
• Minutes for Extra AGWG call on Thurs 20th April 2017 Glenda Sims
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) White, Jason J
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Alastair Campbell
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Alastair Campbell
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Alastair Campbell
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts David MacDonald
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Alastair Campbell
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Alastair Campbell
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Alastair Campbell
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Laura Carlson
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Laura Carlson
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Jonathan Avila
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Alastair Campbell
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts David MacDonald
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Alastair Campbell
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Detlev Fischer
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Alastair Campbell
• Re: SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Patrick H. Lauke
• SC #78 'Adapting text', and a question regarding consensus on icon fonts Detlev Fischer

Wednesday, 19 April 2017

• A measure of element growth due to changing font family. Wayne Dick
• Extra AGWG call on Thurs 20th April 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Option H Testabilty (Adapting Text SC) Laura Carlson
• Re: CFC: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Detlev Fischer
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Joshue O Connor
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Joshue O Connor
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Detlev Fischer
• Re: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Thaddeus

Tuesday, 18 April 2017

• WCAG WG Meeting Minutes April 18, 2017 Laura Carlson
• Re: AGWG meeting April 18, 2017 Pietro
• RE: AGWG meeting April 18, 2017 Hakkinen, Mark T
• RE: AGWG meeting April 18, 2017 Crystal Jones (CELA)
• RE: AGWG meeting April 18, 2017 Smith, Jim
• RE: Key question on SC text and testability Jonathan Avila
• RE: Key question on SC text and testability White, Jason J
• Re: Key question on SC text and testability Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Key question on SC text and testability Laura Carlson
• Re: AGWG meeting April 18, 2017 Wilco Fiers
• RE: AGWG meeting April 18, 2017 Alex Li (CELA)

Monday, 17 April 2017

• Re: AGWG meeting April 18, 2017 Glenda Sims
• Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent Gregg C Vanderheiden

Sunday, 16 April 2017

• Re: [public-low-vision-a11y-tf] <none> Alastair Campbell
• Re: Can someone explain the therapeutic value of switching to one font family Alastair Campbell
• AGWG meeting April 18, 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Can someone explain the therapeutic value of switching to one font family Katie Haritos-Shea

Saturday, 15 April 2017

• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> Wayne Dick
• Re: Can someone explain the therapeutic value of switching to one font family Alastair Campbell
• Survey questions for J&K and H&I Laura Carlson
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Laura Carlson
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Laura Carlson
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Laura Carlson
• Re: Can someone explain the therapeutic value of switching to one font family Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Adapting Text: "narrow values" vs "wide values" how to reach consensus (was Can someone explain the therapeutic value of switching to one font family) Laura Carlson
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) David MacDonald
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Katie Haritos-Shea
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Laura Carlson
• Can someone explain the therapeutic value of switching to one font family Wayne Dick
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Laura Carlson
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Laura Carlson

Friday, 14 April 2017

• RE: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents EA Draffan
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) David MacDonald
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Wayne Dick
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Laura Carlson
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Laura Carlson
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Laura Carlson
• Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I) Laura Carlson
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Joshue O Connor
• Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I Gregg Vanderheiden RTF

Thursday, 13 April 2017

• Re: CFC: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Jeanne Spellman
• Silver Task Force update Jeanne Spellman
• Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I David MacDonald
• Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I David MacDonald
• Re: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Milliken, Neil
• RE: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: 48-Hour Call for Consensus (CfC): Two COGA FPWDs John Foliot
• Re: CFC: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Jim Allan
• Re: CFC: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Michael Pluke
• Re: CFC: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Laura Carlson
• Call minutes Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I Laura Carlson
• RE: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• CFC: Request to publish COGA Issue papers, Gap Analysis & Road Map documents Joshue O Connor
• Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Jim Allan
• Re: Extra AGWG call on Thurs 13th April 2017 David MacDonald
• Please book for TPAC Michael Cooper
• Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Jeanne Spellman
• Re: Extra AGWG call on Thurs 13th April 2017 Laura Carlson

Wednesday, 12 April 2017

• Re: target size David MacDonald
• RE: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Kathy Wahlbin
• Extra AGWG call on Thurs 13th April 2017 Joshue O Connor
• RE: target size White, Jason J
• Re: target size Gregg C Vanderheiden
• target size David MacDonald
• Re: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Glenda Sims
• RE: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Jonathan Avila
• RE: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' White, Jason J
• Re: Heading Navigation in GitHub Issues Joshue O Connor

Tuesday, 11 April 2017

• Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Detlev Fischer
• RE: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Kathy Wahlbin
• Heading Navigation in GitHub Issues Wayne Dick
• Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Marc Johlic
• Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' David MacDonald
• Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Andrew Kirkpatrick
• CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation' Joshue O Connor
• Re: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 Moe Kraft
• WebRTC testing in WebEx Michael Cooper
• Re: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 Mike Elledge
• RE: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 EA Draffan
• RE: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• RE: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 Milliken, Neil
• Re: Adapting text question on this week's survey Laura Carlson
• Re: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 Denis Boudreau (Deque)
• Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent Wilco Fiers
• RE: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 Smith, Jim
• Re: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 Wayne Dick
• Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent Wayne Dick

Monday, 10 April 2017

• Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent David MacDonald
• RE: Technolog Agnostic / Independent White, Jason J
• Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent Wayne Dick
• Re: Adapting text question on this week's survey Laura Carlson
• Re: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 Joshue O Connor
• RE: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 White, Jason J
• Re: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 White, Jason J
• Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: Separate WCAG doc for non-SC guidelines kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent Wayne Dick
• Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent David MacDonald
• Adapting text question on this week's survey Laura Carlson
• Re: Technolog Agnostic / Independent Patrick H. Lauke
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 10 April 2017 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Technolog Agnostic / Independent Wayne Dick
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Laura Carlson
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Laura Carlson
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Joshue O Connor
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Joshue O Connor
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Detlev Fischer
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Joshue O Connor
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Detlev Fischer
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Joshue O Connor
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Laura Carlson

Friday, 7 April 2017

• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Wayne Dick
• RE: AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 Repsher, Stephen J
• AGWG meeting April 11th - 2017 Joshue O Connor
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Separate WCAG doc for non-SC guidelines Alastair Campbell
• Re: Separate WCAG doc for non-SC guidelines Joshue O Connor
• RE: Separate WCAG doc for non-SC guidelines Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: Separate WCAG doc for non-SC guidelines David MacDonald
• Re: Separate WCAG doc for non-SC guidelines Alastair Campbell
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Joshue O Connor
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Jonathan Avila
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Gregg C Vanderheiden

Thursday, 6 April 2017

• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Judy Brewer
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. John Foliot
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Fwd: Fwd: EME and Accessibility Judy Brewer
• RE: EME impact on accessibility Repsher, Stephen J
• Fwd: EME and Accessibility Judy Brewer
• RE: Adapting Text SC: Addressing the main issues Repsher, Stephen J
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. John Foliot
• Separating out SC 2.5.3 and 2.5.4 (issue #196) / draft definition of pointer gesture (issue #264) Detlev Fischer
• Minutes for Thursday, April 6, 2017 Supplemental AG Mtg Glenda Sims
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Michael Pluke
• Re: Is there a call today Joshue O Connor
• Re: WebEx info for Thursday AG call, 11:30 am Boston time Joshue O Connor
• Re: Is there a call today David MacDonald
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. David MacDonald
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Wayne Dick
• RE: Check List Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Wayne Dick
• Re: Is there a call today Joshue O Connor
• Is there a call today lisa.seeman
• Re: Adapting Text SC: Addressing the main issues Laura Carlson
• Re: Check List Laura Carlson
• RE: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Michael Pluke
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Joshue O Connor
• Re: Check List David MacDonald
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. lisa.seeman
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. lisa.seeman
• Call for Exclusions: Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Rules Format 1.0 Xueyuan Jia
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. David MacDonald
• Re: Adapting Text SC: Addressing the main issues Gregg C Vanderheiden

Wednesday, 5 April 2017

• Re: Special fonts don't matter for font-family change. Alastair Campbell
• Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change. Wayne Dick
• Re: EME impact on accessibility Alastair Campbell
• Adapting Text SC: Addressing the main issues Laura Carlson
• Re: Check List Laura Carlson
• Check List Wayne Dick
• Special fonts don't matter for font-family change. Wayne Dick
• Re: EME impact on accessibility Judy Brewer
• Re: EME impact on accessibility John Foliot
• Re: EME impact on accessibility Alastair Campbell
• RE: EME impact on accessibility Jonathan Avila
• EME impact on accessibility Alastair Campbell
• Re: SC Managers and public comments Andrew Kirkpatrick
• TPAC 2017 Survey Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Comments on the discussion about target size and accidental activation (was Re: Minutes: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017) Alastair Campbell
• SC Managers and public comments Joshue O Connor

Tuesday, 4 April 2017

• Re: Comments on the discussion about target size and accidental activation (was Re: Minutes: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017) Gregg C Vanderheiden
• RE: Comments on the discussion about target size and accidental activation (was Re: Minutes: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017) Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL
• Re: Are these SC now testable? Detlev Fischer
• RE: Comments on the discussion about target size and accidental activation (was Re: Minutes: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017) kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com
• Re: Comments on the discussion about target size and accidental activation (was Re: Minutes: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017) David MacDonald
• Re: Comments on the discussion about target size and accidental activation (was Re: Minutes: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017) David MacDonald
• Re: Comments on the discussion about target size and accidental activation (was Re: Minutes: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017) Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Comments on the discussion about target size and accidental activation (was Re: Minutes: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017) John Foliot
• Are these SC now testable? lisa.seeman
• Comments on the discussion about target size and accidental activation (was Re: Minutes: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017) Patrick H. Lauke
• Minutes: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 James Nurthen
• ISSUE-48: How to tighten conformance model for adapting text sc Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-47: Defining single-pointer activation Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: AGWG meeting April 5, 2017 Abma, J.D. (Jake)
• Re: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Joshue O Connor
• FW: AGWG meeting April 5, 2017 Schnabel, Stefan
• Re: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Thaddeus
• Re: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Jeanne Spellman
• RE: AGWG meeting April 5, 2017 Windmann, Nicole
• Re: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Denis Boudreau
• Re: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.
• Re: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Bailey, Bruce
• Re: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Alastair Campbell

Monday, 3 April 2017

• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal Gregg C Vanderheiden
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 3 April 2017 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Detlev Fischer
• RE: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 EA Draffan
• RE: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.
• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal David MacDonald
• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal David MacDonald
• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Re: CFC: Standing consent to publish working drafts on monthly schedule Andrew Kirkpatrick

Sunday, 2 April 2017

• Re: CFC: Publication of FPWD for Accessibility Conformance Testing Rules Format 1.0 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: CFC: Changes to Editor's draft require CFCs Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal Wayne Dick

Saturday, 1 April 2017

• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal David MacDonald
• RE: AGWG meeting April 4, 2017 Michael Pluke
• Re: Color Test: A formal proposal Gregg C Vanderheiden
• Color Test: A formal proposal Wayne Dick
• I've updated spreadsheet with a list of public comments for each SC David MacDonald

Last message date: Friday, 30 June 2017 17:16:41 UTC