Re: CFC: Target Size and Target Size (no exception) SC

+1, though I'd suggest changing

"In-Page: The target is a text link..."

to a more general

"In-Page: The target is a link..."

for the same reasons we discussed at length about generalising, rather 
than artificially limiting, the scope of exceptions.

P

On 23/05/2017 17:46, Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote:
> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday May 25rd at 1:00pm Boston time.
> 
> The Working Group has reviewed and approved two new Success Criteria for 
> inclusion in the Editor’s Draft: Target Size and Target Size (no 
> exception), at AA and AAA respectively, with the goal of obtaining 
> additional input external to the working group.
> 
> Survey 
> results: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/SCreview_May_17/#wbsq4/results 
> 
> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2017/05/23-ag-minutes.html#item04
> 
> The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full draft:
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/target-size_ISSUE-60/guidelines/#target-size
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/target-size_ISSUE-60/guidelines/#target-size-no-exception 
> <https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/target-size_ISSUE-60/guidelines/#target-size-all>
> 
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have 
> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you 
> “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know 
> before the CfC deadline.
> 
> Thanks,
> AWK
> 
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
> Adobe
> 
> akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> Thanks,
> AWK
> 
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe
> 
> akirkpat@adobe.com <mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk


-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2017 20:41:42 UTC