Re: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental Activation'

+1

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> To be clear for everyone, the language being accepted is at
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/accidental-activation_ISSUE-65//guidelines/#
> accidental-activation
>
> Here’s the SC text:
>
> For single-pointer activation, at least one of the following is true:
>
>    - Activation is on the up event, either explicitly or implicitly as a
>    platform's generic activation/click event;
>    - A mechanism is available that allows the user to choose the up-event
>    as an option;
>    - Confirmation is provided, which can dismiss activation;
>    - Activation is reversible;
>    - Down-event activation event is essential and waiting for the
>    up-event would invalidate the activity.
>
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>
> From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
> Date: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 12:45
> To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Subject: CFC: Resolution to accept the candidate SC 'Accidental
> Activation'
> Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 12:45
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Thurs April 13th at 1:00pm Boston time.
>
> On todays call the WG came to a resolution and accepted the proposed SC 'Accidental
> Activation'. [1]
>
> Here are previous responses, and the most recent survey. [2] [3]
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/65
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag21%2Fissues%2F65&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfc490a383fd4d9db1fa08d480fa3ced%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636275259685812309&sdata=KAOEoAsF1LeDrlUn5ctq8e2q0jiD48bySmpIBBECPvA%3D&reserved=0>
>
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/March14SCReviews/results#xq6
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2FMarch14SCReviews%2Fresults%23xq6&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfc490a383fd4d9db1fa08d480fa3ced%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636275259685822300&sdata=gKL%2F6LESi%2FE8kRPOGYeI%2FbrbtO9RIdPOiriyt5L78Ww%3D&reserved=0>
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/2017April5_top3/results
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2F2017April5_top3%2Fresults&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfc490a383fd4d9db1fa08d480fa3ced%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636275259685822300&sdata=Hah6RtZ3nRhbKuH6xaOQND%2F4%2Fa80yDE5442heOXLipA%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
> --
> Joshue O Connor
> Director | InterAccess.ie
>