- From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 18:41:12 +0100
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <594D52B8.3090407@interaccess.ie>
AGWG’ers, As we have received substantially positive feedback leading up to this CfC, this CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group. There was a suggestion from James to add a note in Understanding documents to provide more examples of where a 2D layout is required, as well as other exemptions such as code editors that cannot wrap text etc. This decision will be recorded at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FDecisions&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1ab6006ec2be48e88f9008d4a210961e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311639507586899&sdata=IafGoKjeQf7zBqxVj8m380hh8%2BWgU1VfPa2tZjq0Bx8%3D&reserved=0> Joshue O Connor wrote: > Call For Consensus — ends FridayJune 23rd at 1:00pmBoston time. > > The Working Group has reviewed and approved a Success Criterion for > inclusion in the Editor’s Draft: "Zoom Content (was Resize Content)" > with the goal of obtaining additional input external to the working group. > > SC TEXT: > > "Content can be displayed at a minimum width of 320 CSS pixels without > loss of content or functionality, and without requiring scrolling in > the direction of text except for parts of the content which require > two-dimensional layout for usage or meaning. > > Note: The width of 320 CSS pixels is equivalent to a browser width of > 1280 pixels wide at 400% zoom. > > Note: Examples of content which require two-dimensional layout are > images, maps, diagrams, video, games, presentations, data tables, and > interfaces where it is necessary to keep toolbars in view while > manipulating content." > > Survey results: > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/NewSC_April25_2017/results#xq10 > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/SCs_April_11/results#xq6 > GIT Hub: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/77 > > The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full draft: > https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/resize-content_ISSUE-77/guidelines/#zoom-content > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have > not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you > “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know > before the CfC deadline. > > Thanks > -- > Joshue O Connor > Director | InterAccess.ie -- Joshue O Connor Director | InterAccess.ie
Received on Friday, 23 June 2017 17:41:47 UTC