W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft

From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 18:41:12 +0100
Message-ID: <594D52B8.3090407@interaccess.ie>
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
AGWG’ers,

As we have received substantially positive feedback leading up to this 
CfC, this CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group. 
There was a suggestion from James to add a note in Understanding 
documents to provide more examples of where a 2D layout is required, as 
well as other exemptions such as code editors that cannot wrap text etc.

This decision will be recorded at 
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions 
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FDecisions&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1ab6006ec2be48e88f9008d4a210961e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311639507586899&sdata=IafGoKjeQf7zBqxVj8m380hh8%2BWgU1VfPa2tZjq0Bx8%3D&reserved=0>


Joshue O Connor wrote:
> Call For Consensus — ends FridayJune 23rd at 1:00pmBoston time.
>
> The Working Group has reviewed and approved a Success Criterion for 
> inclusion in the Editor’s Draft: "Zoom Content (was Resize Content)" 
> with the goal of obtaining additional input external to the working group.
>
> SC TEXT:
>
> "Content can be displayed at a minimum width of 320 CSS pixels without 
> loss of content or functionality, and without requiring scrolling in 
> the direction of text except for parts of the content which require 
> two-dimensional layout for usage or meaning.
>
> Note: The width of 320 CSS pixels is equivalent to a browser width of 
> 1280 pixels wide at 400% zoom.
>
> Note: Examples of content which require two-dimensional layout are 
> images, maps, diagrams, video, games, presentations, data tables, and 
> interfaces where it is necessary to keep toolbars in view while 
> manipulating content."
>
> Survey results:
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/NewSC_April25_2017/results#xq10
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/SCs_April_11/results#xq6
> GIT Hub: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/77
>
> The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full draft:
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/resize-content_ISSUE-77/guidelines/#zoom-content 
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have 
> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you 
> “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know 
> before the CfC deadline.
>
> Thanks
> -- 
> Joshue O Connor
> Director | InterAccess.ie

-- 
Joshue O Connor
Director | InterAccess.ie
Received on Friday, 23 June 2017 17:41:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:13 UTC