- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 15:55:11 -0400
- To: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDYkO72PvEVeJjjNkws5rx-cuRorN_sjAaQDY+Ui5ay19Q@mail.gmail.com>
I suggest we drop back to 300%. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie> wrote: > Thanks Alastair for following up. > > Josh > > Alastair Campbell wrote: > > Um, I sent this to the list a week ago, could we start there? > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I’ve put together some initial responses to comments on the Resize content > SC, both from public/member comments, and the recent survey: > > https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Resize_ > content_issues_review > > > > I’ve combined up comments and grouped them by theme to keep it (more) > manageable, so there are three main responses, and then ‘other issues’ > below is smaller issues/comments. > > > > I **think** most aspects can be tackled in the understanding document, > and the proposed the response outlines what that would be. > > > > The main question is the relation to the current 1.4.4, where (as > predicted) it would be clearer if we could edit 1.4.4, even just to raise > it a level. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > > > > > > > *From: *Joshue O Connor > > > > Hi all, > > Apologies but we had a resolution on this SC on a call in January but I > neglected to send out the CFC to the list. Thanks to Marc Johlic for > pointing this out - so I'm sending this out now. [1] > > On that call - the working group accepted the proposed SC 'Resize > Content' - with minor changes. [1] > > Here is a link to the issue and the most recent survey. [2] [3] > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before > the CfC deadline - 6th May 18:00 EST. > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/01/31-wai-wcag-minutes.html#resolution03 > [2] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/77 > [3] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/SC_review_Jan2017/results > > -- > Joshue O Connor > Director *| InterAccess.ie * > > > -- > Joshue O Connor > Director | InterAccess.ie >
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:55:46 UTC