W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Low Vision and COGA should Drop Support for WCAG 2.1 if the AG WG is not willing make real change.

From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:50:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJeQ8SD30dMj8OaK8vG6XNvJFYsF4gDLNfKPJD=ZvBWtZjKFEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
The assumptions of WCAG 2.0 cannot support low vision or cognitive
disabilities in ways essential to access.  A page can pass WCAG 2.0 at
level AAA and fail to be usable by people with low vision and cognitive

WCAG 2.0 did worse than nothing for low vision and cognitive disabilities.
It created the illusion that we were helped when we were being left out.
This may be hard to accept if you worked hard on WCAG 2.0. However, it is
time to accept this fact and start solving the problem.

There is no point of 2.1 continuing the false illusion that it provides
meaningful help, when it does not.

Low vision needs a few fundamental things. Personalization of text:
font-family, spacing, color. The precise limits are these: any font family
the user chooses, spacing that has been proven to be useful, and 16M
colors. We need ability to enlarge significantly at least  400% with word
wrapping. We need single column access. That is what is needed. If the WCAG
2.0 assumptions cannot support this need then we need to change the

I am sure there are similar bedrock issues for Cognitive Disabilities.

The basic idea of accessibility for a disability is that a person with the
disability can use the resource. Right now WCAG does not support access for
the majority of people with visual disabilities and most people with
cognitive disabilities. That is just a fact. COGA and LVTF have documented
this decisively.

‚ÄčIf the AG cannot change some WCAG 2.0 assumptions then would the W3C just
stop claiming they make guidelines that provide access to people with
disabilities when it fails to do so. Just say the WAI gives guidance on how
to help some disabilities‚Äč. State explicitly that Low vision and Cognitive
disabilities are not included.

With that admission, people with these disabilities could then proceed to
devise guidelines that would help us without the interference of WAI.

Right now WAI is harming these disabilities because developers and
legislators believe that if they follow the WCAG guidelines than most
disabilities are covered. This is false. Low Vision and Cognitive
Disabilities are not covered.

The WAI just failed these disabilities. Live with it. WAI can do something
about it, live in denial, or leave the field to people who know how to help.
Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2017 22:51:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:12 UTC