- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:52:38 +0000
- To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Patrick wrote:
> If that was the original intent even in WCAG 2.0, this would be an editorial change, rather than a substantive change, that should be easy to incorporate into WCAG 2.1?
That seems reasonable.
My original intent in asking this was to see if anyone mentioned Flash or Silverlight. Crickets on that…
My suggestion for what we consider for 2.1 is: are there people prepared to write techniques for a technology?
I.e. We can’t be held hostage by a defunct technology that isn’t being updated and has no-one available to contribute techniques.
Cheers,
-Alastair
Received on Friday, 21 April 2017 09:53:14 UTC