RE: Alternative approach for Plain Language

From: Michael Gower [mailto:michael.gower@ca.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 2:35 PM

On today's call (in the extended time), I proposed a departure from the current approach to Plain Lanugage, which I was asked to draft. Here it is:

https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/30#issuecomment-303492002

[Jason] I think you've identified a lacuna in WCAG 2.0. As I have major concerns about the feasibility of requiring the use of a controlled or restricted vocabulary, I think this proposal is a worthy alternative.




________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________