Editorial issues (was RE: CFC Add Accessible authentication into Editors Draft)

Please note the editorial issues below with the text proposed in the CfC. This is not my response to the CfC itself.

From: Joshue O Connor [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 2:50 PM

Essential steps of an authentication process, which rely upon recalling or transcribing information, have one of the following:

  *       alternative essential steps, which do not rely upon recalling and transcribing information; or
[Jason] Shouldn’t the “and” be an “or” in this item (i.e., “recalling or transcribing”)?

  *       an authentication-credentials reset process, which does not rely upon recalling and transcribing information
[Jason] The same issue occurs in this alternative too.


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.

Thank you for your compliance.


Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2017 20:55:48 UTC