W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: Must "technologies being used" be in a SC's text, if that SC has support in 2 technologies?

From: Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:27:09 -0400
Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, Stephen Repsher <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>, To Henry <shawn@w3.org>, Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>, Jason J White <jjwhite@ets.org>, "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3C1ACB1E-8B90-438A-B3B7-39A0D482B4CA@umd.edu>
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
only those that are technology dependent and we only think this will work with certain types of technology (e.g. only works with technology having a style sheet) 
Gregg C Vanderheiden

> On Apr 24, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Gregg and all,
> On 4/24/17, Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu> wrote:
>> We need to be careful that we don’t write the guidelines to only apply for
>> today. We want to write guidelines that will apply for the future as well.
>> So, I don’t think that we can drop the phrase because it works with technologies
>> today if we know there is a revolution coming. And there is a revolution coming
>> including 3-D immersive etc
> If that is the case, do we need the "technologies being used" language
> on all of our SCs?
>> As to what technologies there are out there today, I’m not the expert on that. I just
>> posted another message just before this asking that question.
> Thank you.
> Kindest Regards,
> Laura
> -- 
> Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 24 April 2017 14:27:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:12 UTC