Re: CFC: Supplementary document for WCAG 2.1

+1 and agree with David's proposal.

- Makoto



2017-05-24 1:49 GMT+09:00 Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>:
> Resending with the “high priority” flag per our process…
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday May 25rd at 12:00pm Boston time.
>
> The Working Group has discussed the idea of providing additional guidance
> for accessibility beyond what is able to be included within WCAG 2.1. The
> idea is that success criteria proposals that cannot reach consensus or that
> there is insufficient time to review still have valuable information that
> might be able to be published for use. This idea was surveyed
> (https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/WCAG21_supp/results) and discussed on
> the call (https://www.w3.org/2017/05/23-ag-minutes.html#item01) and a
> resolution received consensus:
>
> RESOLUTION: the working group has agreed to publisihing supplemental
> guidance in 1 document that is non-normative
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being
> able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC
> deadline.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk

Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2017 14:37:09 UTC