- From: Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. <makoto.ueki@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 23:36:35 +0900
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
+1 and agree with David's proposal. - Makoto 2017-05-24 1:49 GMT+09:00 Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>: > Resending with the “high priority” flag per our process… > > Call For Consensus — ends Thursday May 25rd at 12:00pm Boston time. > > The Working Group has discussed the idea of providing additional guidance > for accessibility beyond what is able to be included within WCAG 2.1. The > idea is that success criteria proposals that cannot reach consensus or that > there is insufficient time to review still have valuable information that > might be able to be published for use. This idea was surveyed > (https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/WCAG21_supp/results) and discussed on > the call (https://www.w3.org/2017/05/23-ag-minutes.html#item01) and a > resolution received consensus: > > RESOLUTION: the working group has agreed to publisihing supplemental > guidance in 1 document that is non-normative > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being > able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC > deadline. > > Thanks, > AWK > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility > Adobe > > akirkpat@adobe.com > http://twitter.com/awkawk > Thanks, > AWK > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > Group Product Manager, Accessibility > Adobe > > akirkpat@adobe.com > http://twitter.com/awkawk
Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2017 14:37:09 UTC