- From: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:39:05 +0100
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- CC: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-ID: <58F73039.10804@interaccess.ie>
> Patrick H. Lauke <mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk> > 19 April 2017 at 10:11 > On 19/04/2017 10:07, Joshue O Connor wrote: >> All replies to any comment need to be agreed as the working group >> consensus for that issue. They need to be drafted and then surveyed by >> the group. >> >> Those replies can be surveyed by the group etc. > > Would I be right in saying that this applies only to *official* > replies denoted as coming explicitly from the WCAG WG? Correct. Discussion can continue for sure - but at some stage there has to be a 'consensus' reply from the group. We can mark them as such in the comment itself. So for example, if Detlev makes a response that the group feel represents the consensus stance - (after survey etc) - then it can be marked up/labelled as such. > Because otherwise, I'd question why we're using a social-like platform > like GitHub, which allows individuals to comment on things, at all. There are pros and cons to using the platform - most options are messy one way or another IMO. Thanks Josh > > P > >> Thanks >> >> Josh >> >> InterAccess - Accessible UX >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> >> Date: 19/04/2017 09:45 (GMT+00:00) >> To: josh@interaccess.ie, laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com >> Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org >> Subject: Re: SC Managers and public comments >> >> I have already replied to public comments to issue #61 Pointer >> gestures by >> >> - Webaim https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/264 >> - Microsoft https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/196 >> >> ...as well as to a public comment on issue #66 Pointer inputs with >> additional sensors by >> >> - Miocrosoft https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/194 >> >> not knowing that this was not the expected procedure. >> >> Should I delete or move my replies so they may forst be discussed / >> agreed upon? >> >> Best, >> Detlev >> >> -- >> Detlev Fischer >> testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese >> Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg >> >> Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45 >> Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5 >> >> http://www.testkreis.de >> Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites > > > Joshue O Connor <mailto:josh@interaccess.ie> > 19 April 2017 at 10:07 > All replies to any comment need to be agreed as the working group > consensus for that issue. They need to be drafted and then surveyed > by the group. > > Those replies can be surveyed by the group etc. > > Thanks > > Josh > > InterAccess - Accessible UX > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> > Date: 19/04/2017 09:45 (GMT+00:00) > To: josh@interaccess.ie, laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com > Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > Subject: Re: SC Managers and public comments > > I have already replied to public comments to issue #61 Pointer > gestures by > > - Webaim https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/264 > - Microsoft https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/196 > > ...as well as to a public comment on issue #66 Pointer inputs with > additional sensors by > > - Miocrosoft https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/194 > > not knowing that this was not the expected procedure. > > Should I delete or move my replies so they may forst be discussed / > agreed upon? > > Best, > Detlev > > -- > Detlev Fischer > testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese > Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg > > Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45 > Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5 > > http://www.testkreis.de > Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites -- Joshue O Connor Director | InterAccess.ie
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 09:39:45 UTC