Orientation comments analysis

Questions for Alex and James in-line:

Comments on Orientation #70
265: concerned this doesn’t affect typical web pages today and this should be clarified in so people understand that.
235: not clear whether orientation needs to change any time or if just at load time is sufficient. Group discussed and wasn’t able to find a rationale for why it is more difficult. Additional info sought in comment.
193: question about device preferential orientation. Would some devices claim that portrait mode is “essential”?

Current SC text:
Content is not locked to a specific display orientation<https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/orientation_ISSUE-70/guidelines/terms/21/display-orientation.html>, and functionality of the content is operable in all display orientations, except where display orientation is essential<https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/orientation_ISSUE-70/guidelines/terms/21/essential.html> for use of the content.

Alex, can you clarify whether the clarification to the Microsoft question you’ve received, including on the call today, addresses the question in #193? I suspect that it has since you didn’t indicate an objection to the SC moving to the editor’s draft on the call, but just checking…

Comment 265 will be addressed in the Understanding Doc.

James, comment 235 is the only outstanding one. We did discuss it today but you weren’t there to weigh in. Is this limit (that it is ok to only respond to the orientation change on load) critical to Oracle? Are there examples of where it would be a problem to make the changes on the fly?


Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility


Received on Thursday, 8 June 2017 17:54:41 UTC