Re: Color Test: A formal proposal

Just FYI

Technically — we don’t have any such things as “formal tests”  except for TECHNIQUES.  


This can’t be a formal test unless the SC says that you must do exactly this - or rather  the SC must say  “  Content passes the following test"

you put it forward as an informal test — but the SC is the only criterion for passing the SC.  (that is what its name means—  success criterion. 

The WG COULD propose the test as a ‘sufficient’ test of the SC.   That is — if you pass, you pass.  
But you cannot say that if you fail you fail unless the SC says this specifically. 

Gregg

Gregg C Vanderheiden
greggvan@umd.edu



> On Apr 1, 2017, at 2:49 PM, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I proposed this color test. 
> It should work.
> The colors are selected randomly so that they support a 4.5:1 ratio. 
> This test should be sufficient.
> It tests two random color choices (one dark one light).
> The combination is most likely a mud color (light or dark). 
> The test looks at dark on light and light on dark. 
> It is significant that !important is left off the first test. 
> It should be run  twice, without and with !important.
> The non-important will flush out element level style.
> The important will flush real erroneous cases.
> 
> Look for colors that do not change. 
> Loss of functionality, images disappear, icons dispensary
> 
> If colors do not change add-in background-image: none.
> 
> Pay attention to borders and padding. These may also need to be specified.
> 
> I would like to put this forward as a formal test.
> 
> Wayne
> 
>

Received on Saturday, 1 April 2017 19:59:20 UTC