Re: Errata on WCAG 2.0 1.3.3 and 1.4.1

No problem on my end

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:

> On 17/05/2017 03:20, Andrew Kirkpatrick wrote:
>
>> Gregg suggested (correctly, I believe) that the original intent of 1.3.3
>> and 1.4.1 is being misunderstood due to the language of the notes.
>>
>> The suggestion is to remove the notes for both SC and the explicitly add
>> “color” to the list of sensory characteristics in 1.3.3:
>>
>> *1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics:* Instructions provided for understanding
>> and operating content do not rely solely on sensory characteristics of
>> components such as shape, size, *@@color,@@* visual location,
>> orientation, or sound.
>>
> [...]
>
>> What do people think?
>>
>
> That makes sense to me - this doesn't change the normative meaning of the
> SC and provides further clarity, which is always a good thing.
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>
>