- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 01:41:07 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 11/04/2017 01:37, Wayne Dick wrote: > > The main thing I am reacting to is the claim in many responses that > feature x is not available on mobile hence authors should not be > required to encode in a way that enables accessibility support for x. > This recurs in many external responses. I though we might want to > discuss this before coming up with an answer. This has appeared in > Resize Content and adaptive content. > > The public appears that technology independence has this least common > platform aspect. Sure, and my main point is that unless "x" is something specifically to do with viewport size/layout/relationship of font or element sizes to viewport dimensions, we should not be using the size of the viewport as a proxy for "this must be a mobile device, hence its user agent will/won't support x". P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2017 00:41:38 UTC