Re: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors Draft

+1 with an additional +1 to James Nurthen's points

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Katie Haritos-Shea
> 703-371-5545 <(703)%20371-5545>
>
> On Jun 21, 2017 9:06 AM, "Denis Boudreau" <denis.boudreau@deque.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> /Denis
>>
>> --
>> Denis Boudreau,
>> Principal accessibility consultant & trainer
>> Deque Systems, Inc.
>> Cell: +1-514-730-9168 <(514)%20730-9168>
>> Email: denis.boudreau@deque.com
>>
>> Keep in touch: @dboudreau
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *alands289@gmail.com
>> *Sent: *June 21, 2017 8:24 AM
>> *To: *Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> *Subject: *RE: CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors
>> Draft
>>
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> Alan Smith
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:54 PM
>> *To: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> *Subject: *CFC Add Zoom Content (formerly Resize content) to Editors
>> Draft
>>
>>
>>
>> Call For Consensus — ends Friday June 23rd at 1:00pm Boston time.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Working Group has reviewed and approved a Success Criterion for
>> inclusion in the Editor’s Draft: "Zoom Content (was Resize Content)" with
>> the goal of obtaining additional input external to the working group.
>>
>> SC TEXT:
>>
>> "Content can be displayed at a minimum width of 320 CSS pixels without
>> loss of content or functionality, and without requiring scrolling in the
>> direction of text except for parts of the content which require
>> two-dimensional layout for usage or meaning.
>>
>> Note: The width of 320 CSS pixels is equivalent to a browser width of
>> 1280 pixels wide at 400% zoom.
>>
>> Note: Examples of content which require two-dimensional layout are
>> images, maps, diagrams, video, games, presentations, data tables, and
>> interfaces where it is necessary to keep toolbars in view while
>> manipulating content."
>>
>> Survey results:
>> *https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/NewSC_April25_2017/results#xq10
>> <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/NewSC_April25_2017/results#xq10> *
>> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/SCs_April_11/results#xq6
>> GIT Hub: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/77
>>
>> The new SC can be reviewed here, in the context of the full draft:
>>
>> *https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/resize-content_ISSUE-77/guidelines/#zoom-content
>> <https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/resize-content_ISSUE-77/guidelines/#zoom-content>
>> *
>>
>>
>>
>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
>> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
>> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
>> the CfC deadline.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --
>> Joshue O Connor
>> Director *| InterAccess.ie *
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Strategist
Deque Systems Inc.
john.foliot@deque.com

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion