W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: Adding the word "meaning"?

From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:07:01 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKdCpxwFhDTh73kBOk04kC10zF-uYXnaDRbAcD55iN0DkoA4Wg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Laura,

I won't speak for Josh, but I read (and interpret) that as "context" -
essential content is the "what", but context is the "why".

Josh, does that match with your thinking here as well?

JF

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Josh,
>
> Sorry I had to drop off at the end to today's call.
>
> I want to follow up with you on your suggestion of adding the word
> "meaning" to the intro sentence of the adapting text SC.
>
> "JOC: Some sample text to cover semantics - Each of the following text
> styles of the page can be overridden with no loss of essential
> content, functionality or meaning." [1]
>
> Doesn't the word "content" [2] as defined in 2.0 already cover that?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Kindest Regards,
> Laura
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/04/20-ag-minutes.html
> [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#contentdef
>
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>
>


-- 
John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Strategist
Deque Systems Inc.
john.foliot@deque.com

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2017 19:07:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:12 UTC