- From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:07:01 -0500
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2017 19:07:35 UTC
Hi Laura, I won't speak for Josh, but I read (and interpret) that as "context" - essential content is the "what", but context is the "why". Josh, does that match with your thinking here as well? JF On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Josh, > > Sorry I had to drop off at the end to today's call. > > I want to follow up with you on your suggestion of adding the word > "meaning" to the intro sentence of the adapting text SC. > > "JOC: Some sample text to cover semantics - Each of the following text > styles of the page can be overridden with no loss of essential > content, functionality or meaning." [1] > > Doesn't the word "content" [2] as defined in 2.0 already cover that? > > Thank you. > > Kindest Regards, > Laura > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/04/20-ag-minutes.html > [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#contentdef > > > -- > Laura L. Carlson > > -- John Foliot Principal Accessibility Strategist Deque Systems Inc. john.foliot@deque.com Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2017 19:07:35 UTC