Re: SC Managers and public comments

On 19/04/2017 10:07, Joshue O Connor wrote:
> All replies to any comment need to be agreed as the working group
> consensus for that issue. They need to be drafted and then  surveyed by
> the group.
>
> Those replies can be surveyed by the group etc.

Would I be right in saying that this applies only to *official* replies 
denoted as coming explicitly from the WCAG WG? Because otherwise, I'd 
question why we're using a social-like platform like GitHub, which 
allows individuals to comment on things, at all.

P

> Thanks
>
> Josh
>
> InterAccess - Accessible UX
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
> Date: 19/04/2017 09:45 (GMT+00:00)
> To: josh@interaccess.ie, laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com
> Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: Re: SC Managers and public comments
>
> I have already replied to public comments to issue #61 Pointer gestures by
>
> - Webaim https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/264
> - Microsoft https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/196
>
> ...as well as to a public comment on issue #66 Pointer inputs with
> additional sensors by
>
> - Miocrosoft https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/194
>
> not knowing that this was not the expected procedure.
>
> Should I delete or move my replies so they may forst be discussed /
> agreed upon?
>
> Best,
> Detlev
>
> --
> Detlev Fischer
> testkreis c/o feld.wald.wiese
> Thedestr. 2, 22767 Hamburg
>
> Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45
> Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5
>
> http://www.testkreis.de
> Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites


-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 09:11:40 UTC