- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:14:54 -0500
- To: Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>
- Cc: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Greg Lowney <gcl-0039@access-research.org>, Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Gregg, Replies inline > just replace IT with what IT means. Can you suggest text that everyone can live with? >> Lets' find out what happens with Proposal L&M on the survey. > > I think we are slipping backwards. I thought we resolved this before but … > > > the language > Except for images of text and captions, text styles of the page can be > overridden as follows with no loss of essentialcontent or functionality. > assumes that all technologies allow this - and therefore outlaws all > technologies that do not. > > So anything that doesn’t have style sheets or similar mechanism will not be > able to conform to 2.1? > > or am I missing something? As Bruce pointed out, it goes to accessibility support. Kindest regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Friday, 14 April 2017 16:15:28 UTC