W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I)

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:14:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOavpvc9RO1oGTfDqYVdze6JOLsU0xQEG1zV+RL5xdD4hg1PzA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>
Cc: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, Joshue O Connor <josh@interaccess.ie>, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Greg Lowney <gcl-0039@access-research.org>, Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Gregg,

Replies inline

> just replace  IT with what IT means.

Can you suggest text that everyone can live with?

>> Lets' find out what happens with Proposal L&M on the survey.
> I think we are slipping backwards.  I thought we resolved this before but …
> the language
> Except for images of text and captions, text styles of the page can be
> overridden as follows with no loss of essentialcontent or functionality.
> assumes that all technologies allow this -  and therefore outlaws all
> technologies that do not.
> So anything that doesn’t have style sheets or similar mechanism will not be
> able to conform to 2.1?
> or am I missing something?

As Bruce pointed out, it goes to accessibility support.

Kindest regards,

Laura L. Carlson
Received on Friday, 14 April 2017 16:15:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:12 UTC