We need to be careful that we don’t write the guidelines to only apply for today. We want to write guidelines that will apply for the future as well. So, I don’t think that we can drop the phrase because it works with technologies today if we know there is a revolution coming. And there is a revolution coming including 3-D immersive etc. Also there are a lot of pages that still use legacy technologies. We need to recognize them as well. As to what technologies there are out there today, I’m not the expert on that. I just posted another message just before this asking that question. G Gregg C Vanderheiden greggvan@umd.edu > On Apr 24, 2017, at 8:46 AM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Gregg and all, > > On 4/24/17, Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu> wrote: >> So I agree — stick to web content >> I don’t think we should be making judgements outside of web content > > This gets us back to the question Alastair previously asked [7], "Can > we define those for 2017? HTML etc., yes. PDF, yes. What else would > you call a 'major web technology' today?" > > Gregg, what is the list of Web technologies that must be supported > beyond HTML and PDF? > > I presume that if that list was supported, it would enable us to > remove the "technologies being used" clause. Correct? In other words, > what technologies are we missing? > > Thank you. > > Kindest Regards, > Laura > > [7] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2017AprJun/0270.html > -- > Laura L. CarlsonReceived on Monday, 24 April 2017 13:44:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:12 UTC