Re: Adapting Text proposals for next week's survey. (was Re: Adding Greg L's Adapting Text proposals to the Wiki in anticipation of a vote between J&K and H&I)

yep 

That is what I meant

AND that takes care of the technology problem too.    If you are using a technology that cannot support it — the SC does not apply to you

now at level AAA you can have an identical one that does not have the IF clause in front of it.  That would mean that you cannot use a technology that does not allow it.  And technology restrictive SC are usually at the AAA level  — level AAA being for people who want to go the extra mile. 


Now all you need to do is test the SC on lots of pages and prove to ourselves that this one is doable with all different content types.    I think I can be but don’t know unless we actually try to apply it in lots of places.


G 


Gregg C Vanderheiden
greggvan@umd.edu



> On Apr 15, 2017, at 4:53 AM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Gregg,
> 
> Thank you for your patience. You wrote:
>>> just replace  IT with what IT means.
>> Can you suggest text that everyone can live with?
> 
> I don’t have the language in front of me — but what do you mean by IT?   Just put that in place of the word
> 
> It means override text styles. So maybe it could read something like:
> 
> "If the technology being used has the ability to override text styles, text styles of the page can be overridden without losing essential <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#essentialdef> content or functionality as follows:" Then list the bullet points.
> 
> Does that work? 
> 
> Kindest regards,
> Laura
> 
>