- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 11:51:54 -0400
- To: Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>
- Cc: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, Jim Smith <smithjs@atos.net>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "kimberlee.dirks" <kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com>, "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDYNEsT0iuBKi6ajRW2SsR3h8im1xBqgdxP+3+vtAMCYFw@mail.gmail.com>
The latest version should be linked from the spreadsheet I created. Linked from the short handle. tinyurl.com/jmo9st4 Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 1:31 AM, Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu> wrote: > > I still find it most difficult to find the last versions of things. > > Thanks for letting me know. > *g* > > Gregg C Vanderheiden > greggvan@umd.edu > > > > > On Jun 9, 2017, at 3:38 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > > The word clear and simple were removed from the last version > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > > ---- On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:38:00 +0300 Gregg C Vanderheiden< > greggvan@umd.edu> wrote ---- > > Hi Jim, > > Although I worry that this text still uses words like clear and simple > that are not measurable…. > > regarding your concern, it is important to note that this text appears to > be restricted only to instructions labels navigational elements and error > messages. It does not talk about the content of the page at all. > > You wrote: > Most of the words are not testable, and as a result the scope is > indeterminate. What is clear and simple to a physicist would not be for > most laypersons. But if you restricted content on the web to all text > which is not understandable to most laypersons, then we would have to > remove all medical, legal, ethical, logic,, poetry, academic, etc. text > from the web. > > > > Gregg C Vanderheiden > greggvan@umd.edu > > > > On Mar 24, 2017, at 6:02 AM, Smith, Jim <smithjs@atos.net> wrote: > > All, > > The scope of the plain language SC is as follows: > > "Provide clear and simple language in instructions, labels, navigational > elements, and error messages which require a response to continue,...." > > The technical content of a journal is out of scope for this SC. > > > Regards, > Jim > > > >
Received on Saturday, 10 June 2017 15:52:30 UTC