public-html@w3.org from May 2007 by subject

"Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle

"voting" Re: results of HTML 5 text, editor, name questions

#:body.h2[5]

'role' should be property

(was: Re: Cleaning House)

3 mathematical symbols without MathML

544 reasons to take a look at XForms 1.1

<code type="...">

<font>

<font> (was Support Existing Content)

<form method="GET|POST|PUT|DELETE" />

<table summary> and <td headers>

<table summary> and <td headers> (was: Re: <font> (was Support Existing Content))

@role (was RE: Cleaning House)

@role inheritance (nested tags) behavior, and a RFP

@role, @class, @id and copyright information

[Fwd: RE: headers attribute debate]

[html5] Primordial question.

[html5] Primordial question. Part II.

[OT] Re: Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )

[suggestion] Allow DIV inside any element

[whatwg] <font>

[whatwg] <font> (was Support Existing Content)

[whatwg] setting .src of a SCRIPT element

a quote is a quote is a quote [was Re: Cleaning House]

A view from the trenches

A well composed post re: HTML5 anyone heavily involved in this WG should read and keep in mind.

abbreviation exposition and pronunciation

Accessibility is for everyone (was : Use of headers and summary attributes )

action="mailto:"

Applicable elements for predefined classnames

Architectural Consistency Requirements for Forms

Author incentives for accessibility

BoF at XTech

brainstorm: attributes as virtual tags

class/id values on default Blogs templates

Cleaning House

Common pool of examples and validation

Complex Table Examples

Consensus and Legacy Compatibility (was: Support Existing Content)

continuous? evolution of @class [was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)]

copyright issue [RE: Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3]

Decision process: Formal Objections and consensus in the W3C process

Do we have data? (Was Re: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle)

Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element?

Dynamic renovation of values

eleding, sag, seribute

EM is not synonomous with I, nor STRONG with B

Error handling and legacy content

Extension Mechanism for HTML

Extension Mechanism for HTML (was: Re: Predefined Class Names Solution)

Exterior view of anchor

Form elements

Formal Objection in Questions 1 and 3 on the Ballot

Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3

Forms Task Force Charter Requirement

forms task force volunteers? (tasks survey)

Fwd: Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML

Getting beyond the ping pong match

Getting beyond the ping pong match (was RE: Cleaning House)

Hand-coding HTML (was: New html-element: table3)

headers attribute (was Re: Form elements)

headers attribute debate

help navigating your HTML spec text objection?

Horizontal menu-2

HTML classes of products Re: Support Existing Content

HTML forms

HTML forms, XForms, Web Forms - which and how much?

HTML WG tasks survey results, the remix

HTML:html@profile

HTML:html@profile (was Re: Extension Mechanism for HTML)

importance and emphasis [was Re: Cleaning House]

In the interest of opening a new can of worms...

Is HTML5 Too Big?

Is not better using role="copyright" or <link rel="copyright"> element?

Is not better using role="copyright" or <link rel="copyright"> element? (was: Why not a <copyright> element )

Leading BOM

Line, questioning

Microformat support

missing principle

Mostly Harmless or Warning Label Required? [was RE: Review of Proposed Design Principles]

Moving forward?

Moving forward? (issue tracking, spec review, shaping email discussions)

Moving on

New member - Frank Palinkas

Number of list item

Off-topic : response to Maciej Stachowiak in re e-mail

offtopic news: Court rules in Microsoft's favour on patents; Supreme Court also weighs in

pardon for repetition

Paving Cowpaths

predefined class names

predefined class names (was Getting beyond the ping pong match)

Predefined Class Names Solution

Predefined Class Names Solution (was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match)

Predefined classnames v/s roles (was: RE:Getting beyond the ping pong match)

Prepositions in final position

Prescriptivism and Descriptivism in Linguistics (was Re: Support Existing Content)

Proposal: Chained Classnames

Proposal: Chained Classnames (was: Extension Mechanism for HTML)

Proposed list of predefined class names

Proposed list of predefined class names (was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match)

Rationale for removing the summary and headers attributes from tables?

Re-group, re-focus, reply (RE: "Pave The Cowpaths" Design Principle)

Reminder: HTML in email Workshop tomorrow in Paris

Research for class="copyright"

Research for class="copyright" (was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match)

results of HTML 5 text, editor, name questions

Rethinking HTML 5

Rethinking HTML 5 (Was: Re: Semicolon after entities)

Review of Proposed Design Principles

Roll-down menu

Scope of @role (or @class)

Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>

Semantics - Mystery of the Menu tag

Several button "Submit"

Slides and IRC log of "Future of the Web Page" session at WWW 2007

Stretching of brackets

Style sheet that hides UA-specific requirements

Style sheet that hides UA-specific requirements (was: Re: Rethinking HTML 5)

Substitutions for site/path in SRC,HREF

Support Existing Content

Support Existing Content (was: Proposed Design Principles review)

Support Existing Content / consensus through attrition?

Take the rest of the week off. Really.

Technical motivation (was: Re: Support Existing Content)

Testcase for XMP tag

Testing Accessibility Re: Accessibility is for everyone

Testing the DOM and head elements at the wrong place

The Semantic Debate

toward HTML spec review: issue tracking, breadth-first/depth-first, etc.

Tutorials (was Paving Cowpaths)

Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>

Use of headers and summary attributes (was : <font> (was Support Existing Content))

User agent requirements and document conformance (was: Re: Cleaning House)

Versioning and html[5] : application/xhtml+xml

Versioning and the end user

WA, <input> for folders

WA, superfluous tags

WF2, abolish <button type=remove>

WF2, attach hidden xml

WF2, sending file as xml

Why bother? (was Re: The Semantic Debate)

Why not a <copyright> element (was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match)

will get back to you Re: headers attribute debate

Working Group XTech un-BOF

WYSIWYG HTML Textareas

Last message date: Thursday, 31 May 2007 23:41:46 UTC