- From: Jason A. Lefkowitz <jason@jasonlefkowitz.net>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 17:18:42 -0400
- To: HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <463A51B2.4020000@jasonlefkowitz.net>
That might work, or it might not, I don't have a strong opinion on the matter. But all it accomplishes is to get us to where we already are today (able to include quotes in the block context and the inline context), without really adding anything new beyond removing a wart. And it would break all those documents out there currently using BLOCKQUOTE correctly. So I'm not sure it'd be worth the effort. -- Jason Lefkowitz Maurice Carey wrote: > On 5/3/07 4:20 PM, "Jason A. Lefkowitz" <jason@jasonlefkowitz.net> wrote: > > >> Because then there's no block-level element for quotations, unless we >> redefine Q or invent a new element. Q is currently inline-only. Having >> a block-level quotation element is useful for long quoted passages. >> >> -- Jason Lefkowitz >> >> Maurice wrote: >> >>> So what's wrong with just putting blockquote on the list of deprecated tags? >>> > > > Ok...correct me if I'm wrong (I probably am). > > Block can only contain inline elements. > And 'flow' elements can contain inline or block elements. > How about make <q> a flow element that defaults to an inline appearance so > it can be used mid paragraph for a single line quote and in cases where it's > a bunch of <p> that are being quoted the <p> can handle the block appearance > while being children of the <q> thus making them quoted text? > > > -- Jason A. Lefkowitz web: http://www.jasonlefkowitz.net email: jason@jasonlefkowitz.net "A statesman... is a dead politician. Lord knows, we need more statesmen." -- Bloom County
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 21:21:15 UTC