- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:24:14 +0200
- To: "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 23 May 2007 19:10:37 +0200, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the parsing explanation. Has the revision been tested in > current AT? I'm not sure what you mean by that. It's drafted as part of the HTML 5 proposal and as far as I know it hasn't been implemented yet. (scope= was also part of HTML4, but apparently AT vendors never used it?) >> If there are lots of tables out there that currently use >> the headers= attribute and end users rely on them I suppose the >> traversal >> algorithm should take that into account, as Maciej suggested earlier. > > What qualifies as "lots"? Should we keep looking for more id/header > use cases in the wild? I don't think we're looking for use cases but actual usage. How much content would break if the new algorithm was used and headers= was not taken into account. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 08:25:51 UTC