- From: Dão Gottwald <dao@design-noir.de>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 01:29:30 +0200
- To: Philip & Le Khanh <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Philip & Le Khanh schrieb: > Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > >> Every email client in the world can also read multipart/alternative >> containing text/plain and text/html alternatives. The majority will >> choose the text/html alternative, allowing more attractive and >> readable content which can be better understood by accessibility tools >> than ad-hoc ASCII art markup, while the minority of clients that can >> only understand the text/plain alternative will choose that one. > > Totally off-topic, but are you /really/ arguing that one should > send e-mail in multiple formats ? If so, there are many who > would protest loudly at receiving such bloated nonsense. I must have missed your protest when Maciej and many others have sent their mail as both HTML and plain text. ;-) Btw, Maciej, your HTML didn't degrade very gracefully to plain text. In particular, I didn't see any italics here: 'Why is that invariably a better way of communicating information than using real italics: "abused"?' I guess this answers your question partly. --Dao
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 23:29:38 UTC