- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 01:10:47 -0700
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: "Preston L. Bannister" <preston@bannister.us>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On May 27, 2007, at 12:58 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: > On May 27, 2007, at 07:08, David Hyatt wrote: > >> that the HTML5 spec should limit the scoping to nodes that follow >> the <style> in a pre-order traversal of the tree. > > Making <style scoped> apply to nodes that follow the parent of > <style scoped> in document order traversal seems counter-intuitive > from the point of view of authoring documents. For authoring > intuitiveness, limiting the scope to the subtree rooted at the > parent of <style scoped> makes more sense. > I see what you mean. However, I still don't think <style scoped> should apply to any prior content. Ideally scoped would be defined in such a way that no re-resolution has to occur as you do a forward parse of the document. What about the intersection of the two approaches? Limiting the scope only to following siblings of <style> (and their descendants)? dave (hyatt@apple.com)
Received on Sunday, 27 May 2007 08:35:06 UTC