- From: Maurice Carey <maurice@thymeonline.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 11:47:05 -0400
- To: HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
On 5/4/07 11:12 AM, "Dão Gottwald" <dao@design-noir.de> wrote: > > Maurice Carey schrieb: >> On 5/4/07 7:48 AM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> >>> I think if we really want to discourage people, we need to do more than >>> flag that in conformance checkers. Remember: most people don't use them. >> >> And that's what needs to change! >> The only reason I never used validators is because I had never heard of them >> or the W3C. > > The reason why I still don't use the CSS validator is because it > produces to many useless information (like parsing errors for > vendor-specific extensions, even though the grammar does allow them), > making it hard to see the stuff that matters. > > --Dao > Not disagreeing, but when there's a real problem it sure comes in handy. Also it's been updated recently. The useless 'warnings' are grouped together at the bottom and the real 'errors' are at the top. -- :: thyme online ltd :: po box cb13650 nassau the bahamas :: website: http://www.thymeonline.com/ :: tel: 242 327-1864 fax: 242 377 1038
Received on Friday, 4 May 2007 15:47:11 UTC