- From: Rene Saarsoo <nene@triin.net>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 16:18:21 +0300
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
> The more I think about it the less I think that the current list of > predefined class names in the spec is a good idea at all. > [---] > What is special about the class names in the list? I don't think it is a bad list. Many of them seem quite useful to me. copyright: A screen reader user could easily skip to the copyright information of the article he is reading. error and warning: Non-CSS-aware browsers like Lynx could display errors and warnings in distinctive way (e.g. in red). search: A browser could implement a shortcut for jump-to-search. example, note and issue: Without CSS it might be otherwise quite hard to tell, where a group of example paragraphs end and normal content starts. The same with "note" and "issue", although I'm not quite sure, should the "issue" really be included into that list - doesn't seem such a common use-case to me. -- Rene Saarsoo
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2007 13:17:41 UTC