Re: Why not a <copyright> element (was: Re: Getting beyond the ping pong match)

On May 6, 2007, at 19:59, Nick Drago wrote:

>> Or in a simple case:
>>
>>    <copyright license="http://www.microsoft.com/">
>>      (c) 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
>>    </copyright>
>
> +1
>
> I think this is a good idea. Does WA1.0 already have something like
> this or is this something we can add?

This is currently covered as a combination of rel='license' and  
class='copyright'. The former is already widely deployed and does not  
need reinventing. The point of the latter is unclear.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Sunday, 6 May 2007 19:58:31 UTC