Re: Support Existing Content

On 2 maj 2007, at 21.29, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Wed, 02 May 2007 21:24:57 +0200, Roger Johansson  
> <> wrote:
>> I am _not_ suggesting that non-conforming content is rejected,  
>> only that there is some way of making the user (who can then use  
>> that info when filing a bug report) aware that the page that they  
>> are having a problem with (or not) is non-conforming. If  
>> displaying errors at all is so horribly bad, why do browsers  
>> bother with JavaScript errors?
> You mean exposing them to the end user or the exceptions and such  
> that are part of the language? If the former, dunno. If the latter,  
> well, it's part of the language.

I mean exposing them to the end user (if you're referring to my  
comparison to JavaScript).



Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 19:34:03 UTC