- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 16:48:44 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Quoting Jeff Cutsinger <jeff@cutsinger.org>: > John Foliot - WATS.ca wrote: >> So I will turn the tables - give me a good, realistic use-case where >> presenting nuanced information to some users, while excluding others, is >> "good". > > Simple: when you don't understand how best to present the nuanced > information to the others. And that happens when your authoring tool doesn't support you in that endeavour and makes the different options explicit... P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________ Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team http://streetteam.webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 15:51:09 UTC