- From: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 18:48:09 -0400
- To: schalk@alliedbridge.com
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
This is quite simple. There is no reason to ever use "hacks" or the <br> tag. Also note that <form> is already block level. label input { display: block; } <form action=""> <div> <label>Name: <input name="name" type="input"></label> <label>Surname: <input name="name" type="input"></label> </div> </form> - Elliott On May 2, 2007, at 6:06 PM, Schalk Neethling wrote: > > Greetings everyone, > > I have noticed a lot of discussion about the different form > implementations that are being proposed and I am sure they all have > their merit and place however, after discussing some of the aspects > of coding forms in HTML with a colleague I can surely all agree > that this is one of the areas we all love to to hate. The ways we > currently have to go about making forms look functional an usable > is just not the way we want it to be. > > We have to do all kinds of hacks and none of these are semantic > solutions to get forms to display the way we want them to. I here > propose a simple solution. The majority of users actually prefer > having forms laid out as follows: > > name: > [ form element ] > surname: > [ form element] > > This makes connecting the label to the appropriate field very easy > on the eye as well as a host of other benefits like being able to > add validation errors to the <label> tag without affecting layout > (in general): > name: > [ name] > surname: !you must provide a surname! > [ form element ] > > So what do I propose? Make the <label> and form element tags block > level elements so that form elements by default break to the next > line instead of having to use the current hacks or using the <br /> > tag to break to the next line. > > I believe this will make default form layout a lot more effective > and semantic while still allowing alternate layout of forms using CSS. > > Look forward to your feedback. > > -- > Kind Regards > Schalk Neethling > CO-President > The South African Web Standards and Accessibility Group >
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 22:48:17 UTC