- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 12:47:38 +0200
- To: "Henrik Dvergsdal" <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, 29 May 2007 12:38:44 +0200, Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no> wrote: > On 29 May 2007, at 12:19, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> 3. Implementing something like base= dynamically costs a lot. >> (As far as I know we still have issues with xml:base because of >> that.) > > What are the costs? In theory you would need to reiterate over the entire subtree, calcuate the new URIs and start fetching the new resources. <base> doesn't have this problem, as it is only taken into account during parsing. baseURI and xml:base, however, are defined in a different way. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2007 10:47:46 UTC